Yes,John is a very good name.
An idea that explains something could be called a theory. Good scientific theories are falsifiable which means you could prove it to be false. You can never prove a theory to be true, you can only provide evidence that supports the theory.
thanks for the e-mail. 1.the states government should provide good road for the people 2.the stetes government should provide good school for the childran 3.good eletorcity and good water?.
He provide people with land
no he did not
Not really but sea floor sediments thickness increase with increased distance from spreading centers which is good evidence. Other evidence such as magnetic reversals, temperature, dating methods provide the best evidence of seafloor spreading
The Earth isn't actually perfectly spherical. It is slightly flattened at the poles. To find evidence of Earth's round shape, pictures taken from space are good secondary data to provide evidence.
"I am determined to prove a villain, and hate the idle pleasures of these days."
Good evidence that is related to a crime scene has many factors. Evidence should have scientific proof that a person or persons committed the crime. If there is scientific evidence, it can be very hard to refute the evidence.
evidence involves cops!
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
Proof beyond reasonable doubt. But, reasonable doubt is undefined. It's greater than simply most (called the preponderance) of the evidence but that's not good enough. Beyond most of the evidence reasonable doubt is undefined. I tend to think of it as about 95% of the evidence. So, if Sally says John did it and John says he didn't, John should be found not guilty. But, if the blood type of the John and the killer is one in 100 million John should be found guilty.
First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.
There is no evidence of good grammar in this question.
In many books in recent years, the info and discussions show that king john was a good leader in war, good at improvisation, good at thinking and good strategic. The monkish chronicles in 1206 state that he was a very bad but this information was biased as the monks didn't like him as he was mean to the pope and increased taxes. The portrayal of king John in robin hood shows his bad side which may or may not be true.
To write a good interpretation, begin by thoroughly understanding the context and background of the topic. Clearly state your thesis or main argument and provide evidence to support your interpretation. Carefully analyze the evidence and explain how it connects to your thesis, ensuring your interpretation is logical and persuasive. Finally, conclude with a summary that reinforces your main points and leaves a lasting impression on the reader.
Paleontology, evolutionary biology, molecular cell biology, biochemistry, geology, genetics, biogeography, evolutionary development and so on and so on. The evidence is there in massive amounts. talkorigins.org To start your search. Many links there. NCSE ( National Center For Science Education ) is also a good source.