0
The US has plenty of what can be considered moral laws, from marriage laws, to vice laws which are defined as victimless in nature, but suffer morally objectionable behavior.
The US also has laws which would be in contradiction of a moral law, such laws in how we slaughter animals which are FDA regulated that require exemption to slaughter animals according to the moral law.
Other laws against what we would consider moral laws are usually in prohibition of enforcing or acting in one's moral laws , so anti-moral laws suffer a prohibitive law.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is moral permissibility the same as legal permissibility?
No moral and legal permissibility are not the same. Moral permissibility is what is morally allowed and legal permissibility is what is legally allowed. An act can be morally permissible but can also be against the law.
What is legal moralism?
Legal moralism is the theory or view that the law can be used to ban behaviors that go against society's collective moral judgment on whether it is moral or immoral. It implies that it is fine for states to use coercive power to uphold the collective morality of society, which can restrict an individual's freedom.
What is the differences between legal law and moral law?
"Legal law" are the rules that you must follow or be punished by a government. "Moral law" are the rules that you must follow or be punished by your conscience or Creator. Usually a person will follow one or the other, but not both. And you can tell a lot about a person by which he/she follows.
What is an example of how Roman law has impacted the legal system in the U.S.?
what is an example of how roman law has impacted the legal system in the U.S?
If a promise clearly makes a moral obligation than does the law make it a legal obligation?
Not necessarily. Morals are, by definition, more subjective than the law. You may have a moral obligation to do something for which there is no legal punishment available at all. Maybe you have a moral obligation to give your children presents as your money may permit, but there is no legal obligation to give them more than the necessaries, even if you are filthy rich. In other cases you may have a moral obligation that merely creates a separate and distinct legal obligation. For example, you may have a moral obligation to perform services on a contract, but you cannot be physically forced to actually perform. The only "legal obligation" would be to pay for damages caused by your failure to perform, if any. Therefore, even if there is a legal obligation stemming from such a moral obligation ("you gave your word"), they are not the same obligation.
Can behavior permitted by law be unethical?
Yes, behavior permitted by law can still be considered unethical if it goes against societal values or moral principles. Just because something is legal does not necessarily make it morally right or ethically acceptable.
How business ethics and business law interact with one another?
Ethics is about what we should or should not do, what is moral or "right." Law tells us what we must or must not do, what is legal. A legal choice is not always a moral choice, and a moral choice may even be an illegal one. So, business law is influenced by business ethics, but the two are often at odds.
Is it legal to have a pet mole?
there is no law against it, better not though.
What are the three major theories of law?
The three major theories of law are natural law theory, legal positivism, and legal realism. Natural law theory posits that law is derived from universal moral principles. Legal positivism suggests that law is based on society's rules and conventions. Legal realism emphasizes the role of judges in shaping the law based on practical considerations.
What topics relate to civics?
crime, natural law, rights, immigration, sanctions, legal and moral issues
What has the author Matthew H Kramer written?
Matthew H. Kramer has written: 'Where law and morality meet' -- subject(s): Law and ethics 'A debate over rights' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Human rights, Civil rights, Law 'Objectivity and the rule of law' -- subject(s): Law and ethics, Moral and ethical aspects, Objectivity, Rule of law, Moral and ethical aspects of Rule of law 'Where Law and Morality Meet' 'Legal theory, political theory, and deconstruction' -- subject(s): Law, Deconstruction, Methodology, Philosophy 'In Defense of Legal Positivism' -- subject(s): Legal positivism 'John Locke and the origins of private property' -- subject(s): History, Communitarianism, Equality, Individualism, Right of property, Labor 'Moral realism as a moral doctrine' -- subject(s): Moral realism, Ethics, Objectivity, Realism
Is it moral integrity or legal integrity that allows ignorance of the perpetrators in a republican style legal system where curing crime is not a rule at law without oversight protection?
It is legal integrity.
