Want this question answered?
A body is refered to be in equilibrium when the forces acting on it cancel each other out, that is, the body has no resultant force. because F=ma , it can also be stated that a body is in equilibrium when there is no acceleration or deceleration in any direction. Therefore, if a body is moving at a steady speed, although it IS moving, it is still at equilibrium. We normally do not think of a moving object as one in equilibrium but that is because in an actual situation, air drag would cause an object to be in equilibrium with 0 velocity.
Forces can change the way the body is moving. Speed it up, slow it down, change its direction.. it depends if the body is in equilibrium or not and what forces are already in play
A body moving with uniform velocity is in equilibrium when it moves with uniform velocity as no acceleration i.e. no net force acts on the body.The sum of all forces must be zero in this case. (To avoid rotation, the sum of all torques must also be zero).
If the object is moving on constant speed or it's in rest, it is in equilibrium (ΣF=0)
equilibrium relates to the body systems becuase, the body has to maintain homeostasis. Which means that equilibrium has reached in your body.
yes
A body is refered to be in equilibrium when the forces acting on it cancel each other out, that is, the body has no resultant force. because F=ma , it can also be stated that a body is in equilibrium when there is no acceleration or deceleration in any direction. Therefore, if a body is moving at a steady speed, although it IS moving, it is still at equilibrium. We normally do not think of a moving object as one in equilibrium but that is because in an actual situation, air drag would cause an object to be in equilibrium with 0 velocity.
yes
Rest implies stationary, equilibrium implies a resultant force of zero. Therefore, a body in equilibrium could be moving, for example a sky diver at terminal velocity, where resistive forces are equal to the force of gravity. This means that a body can be in equilibrium and not at rest, but a body at rest MUST be in equilibrium, otherwise it would move. So, to answer the question is: It's impossible.
An example of stress on a chemical equilibrium in the body is dehydration. The water level in the cell decreases, which causes the cell to shrink and become hypertonic.
Consider two equal and opposite forces acting along different lines of the body, which causes the body to rotate, although first condition is fulfilled but body is still moving. Thus, we need another condition for equilibrium that is the second condition of equilibrium.
It means there are no unbalanced forces, or the net force is zero. That means if a t rest it will stay at rest, or if in motion it will stay in motion with no acceleration.It means that there is no net force acting on the object(s). A body moving at constant velocity is in mechanical equilibrium. A body that is not moving is in static equilibrium.
Forces can change the way the body is moving. Speed it up, slow it down, change its direction.. it depends if the body is in equilibrium or not and what forces are already in play
Static equilibrium and dynamic equilibrium, respectively.
A body moving with uniform velocity is in equilibrium when it moves with uniform velocity as no acceleration i.e. no net force acts on the body.The sum of all forces must be zero in this case. (To avoid rotation, the sum of all torques must also be zero).
If the object is moving on constant speed or it's in rest, it is in equilibrium (ΣF=0)
If the object is moving on constant speed or it's in rest, it is in equilibrium (ΣF=0)