Art criticism is the discussion or evaluation of visual art. Art critics usually criticize art in the context of aesthetics or the theory of beauty. This requires a sound knowledge of art and the history of art and demands objective critical analysis of the work/s in question, therefore being far from an easy task, since it implies much more than just giving your personal opinion on the matter.
As a matter of philosophy, I would say, check out the art history - who the artist was, where he was located, materials he used and perhaps, who his contemporaries were. Art criticism is more about how successful the artist was in achieving his goal. With a knowledge of art history you would be able to understand more about the criticism.
As long as there has been commercial art, there has been art critics. Sometimes the criticism comes from the general public and religious or political groups. Sometimes art is criticized because it is concerned technically 'bad" Whistler's painting "Nocturne in Black and gold: The Falling Rocket" was said to have been like, "flinging a pot of paint in the public's face". When the abstract art movement first began, many thought that the artists of the works simply lacked skills Sometimes the art was criticized because of the subject matter. the Impressionist were often criticized due to their painting of everyday subject matter. Currently, most art that gets the greatest criticism is that art which is considered politically incorrect or vulgar such as art which depicts someone urinating on a cross. Everyone has an opinion, everyone has a criticism ... some good and some bad. But as long as there is art, there will be art critics.
imitationalism
it looked to science to explain the world around them, and this also was an influensed intot he art. Da Vinci is a prime example of this becasue he used very detailed notes and drawlings to create his art work.
Modern art was started basically to throw away the old traditions of the past in a spirit of experimentation.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western criticism focuses on theory and the philosophy of art.
Terry Michael Barrett has written: 'Interpreting art' -- subject(s): Art criticism 'Criticizing art' -- subject(s): American Art, Art criticism, History
Diderot's "Salons" had a significant impact on art criticism by emphasizing subjective responses and the importance of the viewer's experience. He advocated for art that evoked emotion and challenged traditional hierarchies in art. Diderot's writings are considered foundational for the development of modern art criticism.
As a matter of philosophy, I would say, check out the art history - who the artist was, where he was located, materials he used and perhaps, who his contemporaries were. Art criticism is more about how successful the artist was in achieving his goal. With a knowledge of art history you would be able to understand more about the criticism.
Jerzy Stajuda has written: 'O obrazach i innych takich' -- subject(s): Art, History and criticism, Art appreciation, Art criticism
Is it iconography? have a Google of 'Iconographic analysis' 'Any iconographic analysis must explain as many visual elements in a work as possible.' I knew that degree in art history would come in useful.
John Kissick has written: 'Art, context and criticism' -- subject(s): History, History and criticism, Art, Biography, Artists