A Theory is just someones idea of what might work. Proof are what most people know will work
Testing a theory is essential to validate its accuracy and reliability. By subjecting a theory to empirical testing, we can assess its predictive power and determine if it can consistently explain real-world phenomena. This process helps to support or refute the theory, leading to advancements in understanding and knowledge.
The word for not being able to explain a theory is "incomprehensible."
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through experimentation or observation, whereas a theory is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence from multiple studies. The main difference is that a theory has been repeatedly tested and confirmed, while a hypothesis is still being investigated.
Empirical validity: the extent to which the theory is supported by evidence from research and observation. Logical consistency: the theory should be internally coherent and free of contradictions. Parsimony: the theory should be simple and economical, with the fewest assumptions. Scope: the theory should be able to explain and predict a wide range of phenomena within its domain.
Robert Hooke was the first to coin the cell theory. It was coined shortly after the invention of the microscope.
A theory is a well-supported explanation for a phenomenon based on evidence and repeated testing. It is a broader concept that integrates various hypotheses into a coherent framework. In contrast, a hypothesis is a specific testable prediction or idea that is proposed to explain a particular phenomenon and can be tested through experimentation or observation.
-- Does it explain things that have already been observed ?-- Does it make predictions that can be tested, and when tested, are found to be true ?
The name in science is theory.
There are many criteria for a scientific theory, it would kill me to list just one, so I'm goint to let you pick from the list. It should be testable. It should be able to be falsified. It's predictions must conform to the observations It should have been repeatedly tested
A theory
No, a theory is an idea someone has to explain something. The veracity of a theory needs testing. A law is an explanation for something, where the veracity of the explanation has been widely tested and as a result of this testing the explanation has not yet been disproved.
Yes
Quantum theory has been tested and theoretical and experimental values have been found to agree to more digits of precision than in any other theory tested against reality!
Yes, a theory is what is then tested.
Explain the theory of use and disuse
Explain Classical Conditioning Theory?
Consistently explains the processes that bring about things that have already been observed, and predicts the results of experimental situations that haven't been tested yet.
no it is a hypothesis