FALSE
false
false
false
Extreme military necessity excuses acts that are normally considered war crimes under LOAC
No. Implicit in the concept of "war crimes" is the understanding that the exigencies of war excuse certain acts that would otherwise be considered illegal. Any act, therefore, that falls outside what is considered acceptable during wartime would still be considered a war crime, regardless of the "necessity." In other words, the concept of "military necessity" has already taken into consideration when deciding what is, and what is not, a war crime.
For the US military; civilians are not normally considered combatants (unless they shoot at us).True
Religion and or resources.
False.More importantly, this has been expressly rejected as a legal defense to accusations of a War Crime. In no case (even in situations where the extermination of the unit - and possible total death of all members - is a likelihood) is a military unit excused from obeying the accepted laws of war. The international community has decided that certain actions are never justifiable, under any circumstances.
The location of military units is normally considered classified information. Unless you see something in a press release from the Royal Navy, to provide that information is not proper.
Housekeeping is physically demanding work and is considered moderately heavy work. Normally experience is not a necessity, however a positive attitude and the ability to work independently is essential. Usually employees will require housekeepers to be bondable.
military symbals
I'd venture to say no, unless something happened to your butt where you NEED the surgery done. If it's not a necessity then Insurance normally won't cover it (and necessity doesn't mean it's cosmetically necessary in your mind).
mediation