256 MB
a measuring cylinder
Fat32 volumes have a minimum size of 512 MB so its not that and FAT file systems are most efficient on volumes smaller than 256 MB, but NTFS is the preffered file system of windows xp so its either FAT or NTFS you pick i am leaning towards NTFS
Meteoroids are smaller than asteroids; most are smaller than the size of a pebble.
If you picture it in your mind they are smaller all over than adults so all of their organs are smaller and that goes for the lung volume as well.
"Most Volvo cars are fuel efficient because Volkswagon makes cars that get excellent gas mileage. They are also smaller than normal cars, and that makes them good too."
The complete question reads: Which are true for NTFS in Windows XP Choose all that apply A supports volumes up to size 2TB B supports file level compression encryption auditing security C supports disk quotas D supports POSIX file system E most efficient on volumes smaller than 512 MB NOTE to Supers: Leave question in the answer as written.
Most cars are smaller and more fuel efficient than American cars. Colder than most parts of the US. Smaller area and less population density. Different form of government. A LOT LESS PEOPLE. Different language. More snow than places in the US that get snow.
The combined volume of mixed substances is typically smaller than the sum of the individual volumes of the substances because the particles fill in the spaces between each other. The smaller the particle size, the more closely packed the particles can be, resulting in greater inter-particle contact and a more efficient use of space.
Most stars are smaller than the sun, falling into the red dwarf category.
No, 1.05 is smaller than 1.25 is.
The smaller the engine the less fuel it will use. But then again an engine too small for the application can use more fuel than a larger engine that is appropriate for the application.
Striped volumes do not provide fault tolerance.