No. Why would we use nose prints when we now have microchips to locate our lost animals?
no
yes they can be used
They have paw prints, everyone knows that!1
=== Yes dogs do have fingerprints. They are on there nose, which is wierd.===
Yes. Dog nose prints are like fingerprints. I don't believe that there is any data base of dog nose prints, however.
Yes, nose prints can be used to identify dogs, similar to how fingerprints are used for humans. Each dog's nose has a unique pattern of ridges and creases, making it possible to distinguish one dog from another. Some organizations and researchers have explored this method, although it is not as commonly used as microchipping or other identification techniques. Nonetheless, nose prints could serve as a supplemental means of identification for dogs.
Of course dogs have different paw prints. Just think about it, every dog is different in size and different breads have different legs. Therefore, no dog would be the same. I have 3 dogs, of different breads and they all have different paw prints.
no
Nose prints can be used to identify dogs as they are similar to our fingers prints no two are alike. This can be one of many different methods to prove the identity of your dog should it become lost or stolen. Other forms of identification are microchips, tattoos, and id tags on collars.
A dog's nose print is unique to each individual dog, similar to a human fingerprint. Nose prints can be used as a form of identification for dogs in the same way fingerprints are used for humans.
Humans use finger prints for solving crimes but dogs do not use paw prints they use nose prints!!!!!!So no 2 noses are the same
they have figure prints.. like dogs have paw prints.