For more than 20 years of existence i just now had the time to visit here is not a correct grammar.
"For so many years of existence i just now had the time to visit here" is not correct grammar "For many years of existence,I now have the time to visit here."
For more than 20 years of existence this may be my first time to visit here is not correct grammar.
The correct grammar between 'an 8 year old' or an '8 years old child' is 'an 8 year old child'.
This is not correct grammar. Correct grammar would be Je parle francais depuis quatre ans. Always use present tense when saying "i've done this for so many years" It means I have been speaking french for 4 years.
No, it is not correct grammar to write About a year and a half year ago.The correct way: about a year and a half ago.Example sentences:The family moved out about a year and a half ago.About a year and a half ago, I broke my ankle.The phrase "about a year and a half ago" means "about 18 months ago".
Either is correct, but you would want to use the first in reference to a single holiday. "Have nice holidays" could be used when there are two holidays close together, like Christmas and New Years.
Yes, structural grammar became popular in the early 20th century, while transformational grammar gained popularity in the mid-20th century, about thirty to forty years later.
Taj mahal completed its 350 years of existence
they have been in existence for 110 years since 1901.
Check your grammar :/
kids can go to grammar school between 6 - 12
81 years!