Theoretically, you would need to be at the equator. However, from the equator you would never see the north star Polaris, because the haze of the atmosphere prevents you from seeing things within a degree or so of the horizon.
In order to see all the stars in the sky ... actually in order to see the whole sky ...
you need to be on the equator.
we are talking about visible stars of course.
The earth has its axis inclined 23' to the ecliptic, so you would have to be within 23' latitude of the equator, either side.
Anywhere on the equator. You MIGHT miss a few very close to the celestial poles if terrain gets in the way to the north or south of you so that they never rise above the actual horizon.
equator
No - as Earth rotates the stars and constellations seem to move. Also, as Earth orbits the sun over the course of a year, the stars we see at night in the winter are different than the stars we see at night in the summer. Same with Spring and Fall.
It's pretty easy. They move west at approximately 15 degrees per hour. Outside of that (which is a result of Earth's rotation, not an actual movement of the stars), most stars don't move appreciably over a human lifetime.
In ancient times, there were several prevailing theories about the existence of stars. While some tribes believed the stars were Gods, others considered them spirits of the deceased. Some tribes also believed that the stars were their ancestors that were watching over them on earth.
The moon stabilizes earth tilt on its axis. Without this the earth's north pole would deviate back and forth over thousands of years. It would even go as far as rolling over 90 degrees causing the entire southern hemisphere to freeze while creating jungles in Antarctica
The constellations don't move but individual stars move forward and back (apparently) as the Earth travels round the Sun. The movement, called Parallax, is tiny and it was not discovered until 1838. Parallax can be measured only for a few 'nearby' stars.
Build a very large pendulum and set it in motion. Then observe, think and explain what you observe over the course of a day.
There is no specific "opposite" to Earth. The Earth is a sphere: it has no front or back. In addition, the Earth is continually spinning. If you were to go outside at night and look at the stars over time, you will notice the stars are moving.
It would take at least 1,000,000 years for the Hubble Space Telescope to observe over the entire sky of 100 billion galaxies in the universe.
the position of one star relative to the horizon over a period of time. :)
Over the entire earth. This is why it is known as global warming.
It is caused by the earth's rotation.
This is a simple one to answer. The Earth rotates and as it rotates, the stars seem to move across the sky.
This is an illusion due to the vast distances between the stars and the Earth's spin. The stars themselves are moving quite quickly, the Earth spinning on it's axis only adds to this cosmic slight of hand by turning under them. The movement of the stars is over vast distances greater than you can imagine. Always remember, most of the movement observed is the Earth moving not the stars. Our eyes simply cannot detect it over the vast light years.
No - as Earth rotates the stars and constellations seem to move. Also, as Earth orbits the sun over the course of a year, the stars we see at night in the winter are different than the stars we see at night in the summer. Same with Spring and Fall.
If you get the opportunity to observe through a large telescope then you may be able to see some of the larger asteroids in the belt. However this takes time, over a few nights as one mist observe the asteroids moving against the background of fixed stars. Usually astronomer use photographs to observe these movements.
A Solar Eclipse, depending where you are in relation to the shadow, depends on whether you see a total Eclipse or a partial.
yes and no depending on how much nuclear bombs it can start a ice age like the asteroid that hit earth so its not enough to destroy the earth