A pseudoscience technically isn't a science. Pseudosciences are practices/doctrines/disciplines that are similar to the hard sciences but lacks the empirical testing system that defines the hard sciences. Astrology would be an example of a pseudoscience.
because science is what makes organisms what they are today, and idrk what the other word is so figure it out yourself
A.They both provide explanations of phenomena
Pseudoscience is usually identified by the following criteria: # Use of vague, exaggerated or untestable claims # Over-reliance on confirmation rather than refutation # Lack of openness to testing by other experts # Absence of progress # Personalization of issues # Use of misleading language If you take astrology as an example; it qualifies (in spades) under criteria 1, 2 and 4: astrological predictions are classically vague, "negative" results are often ignored, essentially astrology is the same as it was thousands of years ago.
Evidence makes all observations and answers in science valid.Evidence.
Technology is what science makes.
True science looks at all available data makes theories and tests them. Adjustments are made when the theory does not fit the science. Our understanding of the universe is an example of this. Pseudoscience is where determinations of what we want or desire is made and we take available information to prove this conclusion. Man induced Global Warming is an example of this.
because science is what makes organisms what they are today, and idrk what the other word is so figure it out yourself
A.They both provide explanations of phenomena
If something is made by science it can not be natural. Further, your question makes no English sense.
+*-=-. Example. 3*-3=-9.
It is the same as any mythology. It is made up of stories to explain the world to the people who did not understand today's science.
No, evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact, The theory of evolution by natural selection, which explains much about evolution, is well supported by myriad lines of converging evidence, is internally consistent, explains the natural phenomenon it should and makes testable predictions. All science. On the other hand, creationism and intelligent design are both pseudoscience. Go here for the truth, talkorigins.org
Pseudoscience is usually identified by the following criteria: # Use of vague, exaggerated or untestable claims # Over-reliance on confirmation rather than refutation # Lack of openness to testing by other experts # Absence of progress # Personalization of issues # Use of misleading language If you take astrology as an example; it qualifies (in spades) under criteria 1, 2 and 4: astrological predictions are classically vague, "negative" results are often ignored, essentially astrology is the same as it was thousands of years ago.
Science its self makes science everything in our world makes science
Im doing this science project and need to find out what makes a good wind turbine. Example: Strength, Aerodynamics...
It attract attention of audience during presentation.also makes presentation enjoyable For example being humor and unique character
Explain the motives that makes some people jacobites?