0
A scientific theory must be based on many repeated correct experiments; also this theory must be related with other accepted theories.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference a scientific theory and a scientific law?
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
What is the difference a scientific theory and scientific law?
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
What was the last scientific theory to challenge the theory of evolution?
No scientific theory ever challenged the theory of evolution.
What is the difference between scientific theory?
Between Scientific Theory and what?
What is required for a theory to be scientific?
Scientific observations and experimental results are required for a theory to be scientific.
What theory that evolution occurs slowly but steadily?
Gradualism is the concept but I would not give it the ranking of scientific theory. It is more a subset of the theory of evolution by natural selection and was first formulated into that theory by Darwin.
What is Definition of scientific theory?
A scientific theory is an explanation of how the world works answered by the scientific method.
What does a scientific theory mean?
That would depend on the scientific theory in question.
How is a scientific law unlike a scientific theory?
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
Is it true that for a hypothesis to have value it must be testable?
What do you mean by "value"?Certainly, if a theory is supposed to have scientific value (if it tells us something new about the world around us), there must be evidence to support it, or else it were a bad theory (or actually not a real theory at all).However, every scientific theory starts off as a hypothesis, which is basically just a "quaint idea". By testing that hypothesis (and obtaining positive results), it might actually be developed into a real theory. If the evidence speaks against the hypothesis, the idea just dies right there (or at least it should).So, a hypothesis has to be testable to have value (so it can "grow" into a theory).
Give an example of a scientific theory and a scientific law?
is the scientific community's best explanation for certain observable facts
How is a scientific law unlike unlike a scientific theory?
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
