Yes, but a human has more energy ! :-D
The energy cost of gold is 88,184,905
Gold and silver
A gold atom has 6 energy levels. Level 1: 2 electrons Level 2: 8 electrons Level 3: 18 electrons Level 4: 32 electrons Level 5: 18 electrons Level 6: 1 electron
More or less everything conducts thermal energy, but to different degrees.
My guess is that anything liquid vs. anything solid always has more energy because it has more heat. The atoms in liquid gold have more energy so they bounce around more and spread apart, making it flow more, and expand. Solid gold has less energy so atoms are more still and come closer together making it solid.
The energy cost of gold is 88,184,905
The energy cost of gold is 88,184,905
Currently, gold is not useful in any form of energy production.
because gold have a native energy but iron does not have that native energy
The energy cost of gold is 88,184,905
Gold resists corrosion because it is very unreactive. Formation of compounds involves steps which take in energy and steps which give energy out. To oversimplify, in the case of gold, the energy-out steps don't compensate for the energy-in steps in many cases.
no
we can use it in the reaction of producing energy
because gold is heavy? and the concrete is too solid/dense to harness the kinetic energy from the fall of the gold ball because when it meets with the concrete the energy is turned into potential energy
It is actually Barrick Energy. Barrick Gold purchased Cadence Energy as a way of off-setting their energy costs for their gold mining operations.
It is not. Gold is easier. Aluminium is energy intensive.
No one answer. It would depend on the gold content of the mineral. The higher the gold content, the lower the energy cost. The deeper the mine, the higher the cost.