Yes, but a human has more energy ! :-D
It takes approximately 64,000 Joules of energy to melt 1kg of gold. Therefore, to melt 2kg of gold, you would need around 128,000 Joules of energy.
The energy cost of mining gold varies depending on the specific mining methods and technologies used. In general, gold mining is energy-intensive due to the need for blasting, crushing, grinding, and processing large amounts of rock and ore. Estimates suggest that gold mining operations consume significant amounts of electricity and fuel.
The heat of fusion for gold is 64.4 kJ/mol. To convert this to energy required to melt 1.5 kg of gold, we need to calculate the number of moles in 1.5 kg of gold (1.5 kg of gold is approximately 0.047 moles). Then, the energy required would be approximately 3.03 kJ.
My guess is that anything liquid vs. anything solid always has more energy because it has more heat. The atoms in liquid gold have more energy so they bounce around more and spread apart, making it flow more, and expand. Solid gold has less energy so atoms are more still and come closer together making it solid.
The heat of vaporization of gold is 158 kJ/kg. To find the total energy required to vaporize 2 kg of gold, you can use the equation: Energy = mass * heat of vaporization. Substitute the values to get: Energy = 2 kg * 158 kJ/kg = 316 kJ. Therefore, 316 kJ of energy is required to vaporize 2 kg of gold.
The energy cost of gold is 88,184,905
Currently, gold is not useful in any form of energy production.
The energy cost of gold is 88,184,905
It takes approximately 64,000 Joules of energy to melt 1kg of gold. Therefore, to melt 2kg of gold, you would need around 128,000 Joules of energy.
Gold resists corrosion because it is very unreactive. Formation of compounds involves steps which take in energy and steps which give energy out. To oversimplify, in the case of gold, the energy-out steps don't compensate for the energy-in steps in many cases.
no
because gold is heavy? and the concrete is too solid/dense to harness the kinetic energy from the fall of the gold ball because when it meets with the concrete the energy is turned into potential energy
we can use it in the reaction of producing energy
It is not. Gold is easier. Aluminium is energy intensive.
It is actually Barrick Energy. Barrick Gold purchased Cadence Energy as a way of off-setting their energy costs for their gold mining operations.
No one answer. It would depend on the gold content of the mineral. The higher the gold content, the lower the energy cost. The deeper the mine, the higher the cost.
The energy cost of mining gold varies depending on the specific mining methods and technologies used. In general, gold mining is energy-intensive due to the need for blasting, crushing, grinding, and processing large amounts of rock and ore. Estimates suggest that gold mining operations consume significant amounts of electricity and fuel.