When I wrote "an MD " today -for some reason, I looked , and thought, MD starts with a consonant , but "a MD " sounded weird. Looked it up. Hit this cop out answer first. I went further. Three grammar sites confirmed " an " is correct. The rule is to use "a'" before words that start with a consonant sound and an before words that start with a vowel sound . MD starts with an 'em ' sound. An FBI agent - sound is 'eff'. So , average American, go with your gut. ESL - my sympathies.
Use "a" MD. Because you would write a Medical Doctor not an Medical Doctor. Regardless of how it sounds, use "a" with a consonant and "an" with a vowel. How things sound or how they are pronounced is subjective. The written word is not.
Yes. Dr. could be a PhD in anything and M.D.denotes a medical doctor.
lovo you both
Yes, as whom is the object of the preposition of.
Both German and Latin descended from a common-ancestor language called Proto-Indo-European, which was likely spoken in the steppes of what is today southern Russia and the Ukraine, perhaps 3,000 years ago or more. Both German and Latin are related to dozens of other Indo-European Languages as well (from Irish to Farsi, from Portuguese to Russian, from Hindi to Albanian). Because German and Latin both come from the same source, Indo-European, their grammars are quite a bit more similar to each other than they are to other completely unrelated languages such as Bantu, Chinese, Navajo, or Samoan.To answer your question, then, German grammar is *not* "inspired" by Latin grammar, but instead both Germ and and Latin grammars are closely related and therefor similar to each other.
Both 'alternatives' are identical.
Yes, this is both proper spelling and grammar.
If you are using Microsoft Word to customize your invitations, you can check both spelling and grammar before printing the final invitations. The spelling and grammar tool is located on the tools menu at the top of a word document page.
no it is not
Both are generally asking the same question. They just contain different grammar constructions.
"Data" is typically treated as a plural noun, so the correct usage would be "data are." However, it has become increasingly common to use "data is" as a singular noun in informal contexts.
They are both correct grammar, but I prefer the first one. This is a question that would probably show up in the SAT or ACT. Both are correct but the second one is the one you want.
lovo you both
Grammar and punctuation are essential for clear and effective communication. They help convey meaning, avoid confusion, and enhance the readability of your writing. Proper grammar and punctuation also lend credibility to your work and demonstrate your attention to detail.
Both "I have strived" and "I have striven" are grammatically acceptable past participles of the verb "to strive." "I have striven" is less common in modern usage, but both are correct.
"Hosted by" is correct when referring to an event or gathering that is being organized or held by someone, such as "The conference was hosted by the company." "Given by" can be used when referring to a gift or donation provided by someone, such as "The scholarship was given by the foundation."
I think both
Good grammar enhances clarity and coherence in communication, improving understanding between people. It also helps to convey professionalism and credibility in writing. Additionally, proper grammar can prevent misinterpretations and errors in interpretation.
"Both of whom" is correct grammar. It is used when referring to two people. For example, "I invited John and Mary, both of whom attended the party."