Do you mean to ask. "Guilty PLEAS are always accepted by the judge???" If that's what you really mean, the answer is not always - especially if the defendant is 'Pro Se' (representing himself) in a criminal action and pleading guilty. The judge will want to make sure that the defendant is properly represented and fully understands the consequences of his pleading guilty and therefore sometimes a judge will not accept a guilty plea. Like everything else in life, and the law, it depends greatly on the circumstances.
In 95% of the cases a plea of guilty is accepted unless there is reason to believe that you are not the suspect in the crime that was committed.
According to the media and to the judge that accepted his "guilty" plea, there was no plea agreement in place.
If the plea is accepted, the defendant will normally be sentenced by the presiding judge.
That will depend on the violation in most cases. Usually if you plead guilty and pay the fine you don't have to go to court. For more serious crimes you may still have to see the judge.
No. If the defendant was found not guilty WHAT would the judge sentence them for?
Adjudicated guilty means the judge resolved the case and found the defendant guilty. Adjudication is the final action that the judge took.
Not guilty plea
First, because that is the way the legal systemn in the US works. Second, how would you know the judge doesn't believe the defendant is guilty? I seriously doubt that the judge would allow a miscarriage of justice - he always has the option of vacating the jury's verdict - declaring a mis-trial and ordering a new trial... if necessary.
sentence
Thomas McKay did not prove Louis Riel guilty. Louis Riel was found guilty of treason by a jury for leading the North-West Rebellion in Canada in 1885. McKay was not involved in proving Riel's guilt; instead, the trial was presided over by a judge and jury.
The jury's verdict affects the judge's decision for sentencing by helping the judge determine the defendant's guilt or innocence.
Purposeful Malfeasance would most likely be a judge that accepted bribes to ensure that a guilty party gets what they deserve inspite of formalities or lack of nessesary evidence to convict that crimainal.