When we look at the night sky, we are amazed by the
countless stars, galaxies, and black holes. Science tells us
that the universe didn’t exist at one point; then, in a
sudden explosion (the Big Bang), it came into being. But
what was there before that?
Why did this universe come into existence?
If even a single stone doesn’t come into being on its own,
can this vast universe have simply appeared by chance?
Has this question ever made you think? It certainly has
made me think.
But the question is, is everything science says always
correct? Absolutely not.
While science is an invaluable source of knowledge, it
cannot always be considered fully accurate or complete.
Our understanding of the intrinsic truths of the Earth and
the universe is constantly evolving. What science may
explain at one point can change with new discoveries in
the future. Science is relative and time-bound, and it has
its limitations.
So, if science isn’t always right, we can’t fully assume that
the absence of the Creator’s existence is an absolute
truth either.
If nature follows its own rules, then who set those rules?
That's something we need to consider as well. Science
can never answer this question, and it’s not something
easily explained. Even today, science doesn’t know, "How
did something come from nothing?" "Where did the
universe begin?" "How did life come to be?"
YOU CAN READ THIS BOOK FOR LEARN MORE
Homosexuality does not need proof. It definitely exists. Just like the existence of water doesn't need to be proven.
h. Immanuel Kant
That is correct. The existence of God, in fact of any god, can not be proven by any scientific means. His existence can only be assumed, by those who wish to do so. It is sometimes claimed that the Bible proves the existence of God, because to Bible tells us about God, and the Bible is God's word so it must be true. Of course, that is a circular argument that resolves as an assumption, not proof.
NO, not scientifically.
Benjamin Franklin proved the existence of electricity.
This is probable but not surely, scientifically proved.
No they can not. It has been scientifically proved they can not. They have such short stubby legs and they are to fat.
No. A virgin birth, as described in the gospels, would have to involve cloning or divine intervention. From a scientific point of view, a spontaneous clone would have to be female, it it were at all possible. Divine intervention can not be proven scientifically because the existence of God or of angels can not be proven scientifically.
Yes, although the existence of ghosts has not been scientifically proven.
God spoke into existence the universe
So far scientists have not been able to prove or disprove existence after death.
Blaise Pascal has been described as a theistic humanist. He recognised that the existence of God can not be proved, but thought it wise to believe, just in case:Belief is a wise wager. Granted that faith cannot be proved, what harm will come to you if you gamble on its truth and it proves false? If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation, that He exists. Although unable to prove the existence of God, he also thought that humans had a spiritual need that could only be filled by belief:There is a God shaped vacuum in the heart of every man which cannot be filled by any created thing, but only by God, the Creator, made known through Jesus.