Capital punishment has been proven ineffective as a deterent to crime.
Added: I would like to see a source cited to support the above answer.
Chile abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes. Chile's laws provide for the death penalty only for exceptional crimes such as crimes under military law or crimes committed in exceptional circumstances
no, however they would still be given an alternative punishment for the crimes committed while underage
That is the usual scenario in which it is applied, however, there are laws on the statute books that call for the death penalty in certain other crimes as well.
Per the US Supreme Court decision in Roper v. Simmons,543 US 551 (2005), no one can be given the death penalty for crimes committed while under the age of 18, even if the person was tried as an adult.Mississippi allows the death penalty on capital crimes committed by offenders over the age of 18.
that the death penalty for certain crimes (grad point) ;)
Crimes that should be punishable by death, but did not get the death penalty in recent times are; crimes of terror attack, and crimes against humanity.
None. There is no death penalty in Mexico.
Proponents of the Death Penalty will argue that it is beneficial for at least two reasons. The first is that it prevents any further crimes from being committed by the alleged perpetrator. The second is that it serves as a strong deterrent to those considering indulging in violent (or other serious) crimes: the potential penalty of death will lead many such persons to choose not to commit offenses.
killing
That would be those who are in favour of using the death penalty for punishment of severe crimes.
most likely murder
Treason