Nope. If they took his name Kane then the real Kane would beat the heck out of them saying that he is the real Kane "Red Machine."
Undertaker has more moves then Kane and his tombstone attack is unstoppable
As the 2009-10 season Kane has more goals.
The Undertaker is definitely stronger because Kane is the little brother and the Undertaker can prove himself against a lot more people than Kane can but Kane is still a really good wrestler. The Undertaker has been doing this for almost 20 years and Kane has been doing this for 12 years so Undertaker has won victories over Kane and keeps winning at Wrestlemania . wrong. they are not real brothers.undertaker is stronger harder and better. more experienced aswell
I think its a reference to the story of kane and abel, kane was jealous of indertaker for having more championships and better accolades
Kane is much stronger, smarter, and more powerful. So Kane would win.
Pro Athlete
It depends... Kane is taller and weighs more while undertake is more known. Undertaker has more experience and I think is better. Undertaker has won more titles but Kane is more capable of getting in peoples heads. I say Undertaker is better, because Kane gets distracted and frustrated easily.
the well traind athlete has more experience and better rehab
in terms great ring agility stamina and fitness Bobby Lashely takes it all without any doubt. Such great athleticism sometimes cannot be matched. Kane is rather more aggressive and intellectually unstable when competing thus Bobby displays a great intellectual ability. All in all Bobby is a better athlete.
An athlete is much fitter than a couch potato and much more thinner and faster.
i like John Cena better but Kane is kul xxxx
There Was A Storyline Involving An Imposter Kane In 2003 But There Was Only One Real Kane.