No, although in theory, everything is done in her name.
Queen Elizabeth I was an absolute Monarch. She had the final word on any government policy and was effectively head of the state. Her namesake, Queen Elizabeth II is a constitutional monarch, and does not wield political power. The power of Great Britain rests in the hands of Parliament and is administered through the prime minister.
The Queen has very little actual power over Australia. Her representative in Australia, the Governor-General, has more power - but her role is mostly ceremonial. The Governor-General plays a symbolic role, representing the authority (provided by the Queen) for the government to rule. The Governor-General has the power to summon parliament, call elections and appoint the Prime Minister (the Governor-General has a responsibility to appoint the person most likely to maintain the support of the House of Representatives). They also appoint other officials, such as High Court Justices. Therefore the Queen, through the Governor-General, does have some power over Australia - but most of this is symbolic.
Unfortunately the Prime Minister commands more power. The Queen has more grace, dignity, wisdom and class than any elected numpty. Her Majesty is the only person in Government who I trust completely. Politicians have become self serving pigs, they care nothing for the UK, they are disloyal traitors who will sell us out to line their own pockets, the all have the same policies we need a complete clear out and get some 'real' people into Parliament. Unfortunately Parliament could pass a simple 'Republic Act' which The Queen would have to sign. Parliament controls the Crown. It's about time we the people controlled Parliament.
The Head of State that is, the King (or in this era: the Queen) was in modern terms the highest executive and judicial figure in the land with near-absolute power. In her day, Parliament met only intermittently and it could be sent home and simply be not convened for considerable periods if it in some way incurred the Queen's displeasure. Its main power derived from the fact that it had budgetary powers which it could invoke when the regular existing taxes were insufficient for the Queen's needs at any point. The Queen had ministers, but these were answerable to her, not to Parliament.
No. In the United Kingdom, the Prime Minister does not have veto power over any legislation passed by Parliament. Technically, the reigning monarch must assent to any laws enacted, but that assent has not been withheld since 1708 and even in that case the Queen's response was that she would think about it.
The Parliament does not need any protection. All power is for the "Cortes", the king reigns but not governs.
No. The Queen is the Head of State but this position holds no power. The Queen is quite literally a figurehead with no political power. After the Glorious Revolution, the monarch's powers (Royal Prerogative) were unofficially transferred to Parliament.
queen of england Canada does NOT share any power at all with the Queen of England, any of her representatives, or any British lord, dame or member of the British Parliament. All references to Britain or Royalty is ceremonial only to keep some consistency in our political systems that date back to the 1800's when we did answer to the Queen. Canada is today an independent democracy and answers to the people. and the USA. Canada shares a lot with the USA, so much that it could be said we share power with them but does anyone really think the USA is going to answer to us if any of these "share" agreements come to push and shove?
nyes
No, any change in marriage laws would have to be passed by Parliament.
There are currently 26 lords in the House of Lords of British Parliament. There are currently no other Lords of in England that have any power. They are Lords in title only and serve as figureheads similar to the queen.
The Queen would not be able to sack the PM without the support of parliament (the majority of which would be made up of the PM's party). However, parliament can remove the royal family if they wish to.