Scientifically, superstitions are considered as a psychological need for supernatural belief
While there are certainly historical, anthropological and cultural reasons behind most superstitions, they are called superstitions because of the very fact that they have no basis in Science.
There is nothing wrong with it as long it doesn't become the science or replace science.
No. Superstitions are not scientific in any way whatsoever.
By definition, a superstition is an unscientific belief. Science and technology are therefore unable to shake many people's superstitions. Lack of understanding of science and technology has led to the development of new superstitions, such as the belief that Mercury retrograde can cause your computer to malfunction.
Superstitions are not based in science. There might be a logical reason like breaking a mirror is bad luck but does not cause bad luck but this is not scientific.
ewan nakakaadik na to.HAHA XD :P
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
You should not believe in Superstitions. Superstitions is the product of ignorance among people. Many superstitions are not true.
There are no advantages to superstitions. They are not based on rational facts or science and come to us from a time when there was no science to explain the world. It is fun to do some of them, but other than that they have no value.
There is none. Superstition is completely bereft of science. However, a savvy person may use scientific techniques to gain advantage over someone who believes in superstitions.
superstitions began when ppl like our ansestors made up these things and started discovering things such as Adam and eve being banished from the garden of eden on Friday and the great flood starting Friday and other things such as that