That's open to debate, but there are more humans now, and most of us live a lot longer than earlier in history, so I'd say it's been more good.
Science has not done more harm than good. If it were not for science we would still be fighting with wooden sticks, be using leaches to cure diseases, and would be drilling holes in people's heads when we thought they were possessed by the devil when in fact they only had a fever.
Yes, but cloning is not one of them since we are aware that it can be done. Science, the search to understand ourselves and our surroundings is probably as old as human kind. It has progressed in fits and starts. We have learned more and more about things but that does not mean we have reached the end.Better understanding will enable us to do more. What we chose to do or not is a different matter.
The work you have done on your science project is good however you can improve by adding more scientific terminology.
Without science and technology human would still be living in the stone age. Science, the logical thinking made humans develop technology that has shaped human evolution. Humans have used science and technology to make life better, faster, safer and far more comfortable. Every day we progress more and more.
By using monkeys, scientists can find out more about primates and the evolution of humans (cause monkeys are related to humans).
Good science is when you use it to make ice cream. Bad science is when you make more Frankensteins
You Probally will like it and be good at it. If your really good at math you should be good with physics.
Science, considering it would take many chemicals, or scientific experiments to do this.
Science by itself is neither good or bad, it's just a tool. It's all in the usage. A hammer can be used both to build things up as well as destroying things. Considering that average life expectance is still rising, I think science has done more good than bad.
Every area of science can advance farther. We need to learn more about everything.
i don't think it is good for humans if they have asthma they end up in the hospital more times then what they need to be
No, visual arts is not a science and it will not be treated as such because although it shows science effects, most of it is just graphics done on a computer, so it's more of an art than a science.