answersLogoWhite

0

The three main ways that the Constitution did protect against tyranny are Checks and Balances, Federalism, and Separation of Powers.

That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

The rule of law is the principle that no one is exempt from the law, even those who are in a position of power. The rule of law can serve as a safeguard against tyranny, because just laws ensure that rulers do not become corrupt.

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What would amending the Constitution guard against?

Tyranny


How do you restate the question how did the constitution guard against tyranny?

You can restate the question as, "In what ways does the Constitution protect against the rise of tyranny?" This emphasizes the mechanisms and principles embedded within the Constitution that serve to limit governmental power and safeguard individual freedoms. Additionally, it invites an exploration of specific features, such as checks and balances, separation of powers, and the Bill of Rights.


How does balances guard against tyranny?

it fights a war in a hole


How did the constitution guard against tyranny with federalism?

Federalism prevents tyranny because it separates the power so it's not all in one place. This shows separation of power because the government and the states have their own laws/rules which they can enforce as they please.


How does the constitution guards against tyranny?

it used four guards against tyranny which include checks and balances Federalism big states VS. small states separation of powers


How does the constitution guard against man's sinful nature?

It guaranteed religious liberty.


How did small state-large state compromise guard against tyranny?

by electing a new governement to suppport the person into controlling the states one by one


The anti-federalist james winthrop argued that a bill of rights was necessary in the constitution because?

it would secure the minority against the usurpation and tyranny of the majority.


How did big states vs small states guard against tyranny?

It did something, I'm only a 13 year old emo kid, I really don't know


Which reason best explains why many antifederalist finally agreed to the ratifraction of the constitution?

They wanted protections against tyranny of the central government.


What reasons did Aristotle come up with for why statesmen should know all the different types of government?

He believed that statesmen should know the forms of government to guard against tyranny.


Why did the authors of articles of confederation create weak central government?

To protect against tyranny