The three main ways that the Constitution did protect against tyranny are Checks and Balances, Federalism, and Separation of Powers.
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
The rule of law is the principle that no one is exempt from the law, even those who are in a position of power. The rule of law can serve as a safeguard against tyranny, because just laws ensure that rulers do not become corrupt.
Tyranny
You can restate the question as, "In what ways does the Constitution protect against the rise of tyranny?" This emphasizes the mechanisms and principles embedded within the Constitution that serve to limit governmental power and safeguard individual freedoms. Additionally, it invites an exploration of specific features, such as checks and balances, separation of powers, and the Bill of Rights.
it fights a war in a hole
Federalism prevents tyranny because it separates the power so it's not all in one place. This shows separation of power because the government and the states have their own laws/rules which they can enforce as they please.
it used four guards against tyranny which include checks and balances Federalism big states VS. small states separation of powers
It guaranteed religious liberty.
by electing a new governement to suppport the person into controlling the states one by one
it would secure the minority against the usurpation and tyranny of the majority.
It did something, I'm only a 13 year old emo kid, I really don't know
They wanted protections against tyranny of the central government.
He believed that statesmen should know the forms of government to guard against tyranny.
To protect against tyranny