A medium to large mass of wood, roughly equatable to that of a four-week-late human baby.
about 700 pounds
None, he's autistic.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much woodAs a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Is the full version.
None!
a woodchuck could chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
as much as he wants
Woodchuck Tongue Twister:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?Answer given in reply;He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Some disadvantages of cobalt include its toxicity in high doses, its scarcity which can lead to higher costs and limited availability for certain applications, and its tendency to cause skin allergies in some individuals who come into contact with cobalt-containing materials.
The original tongue-twister is of unknown origin. In it,"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?is paired with"A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."or"As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
It was originally a question and answer: Q: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? A: As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood!
as much as he wants
As much wood as a woodchuck chucks if a woodchuck could chuck wood..... Riddle answer (It's not supposed to be scientific or just a number.) : As much wood as a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood. See? Not scientifically just a tongue twister. BTW the question's supposed to be : How much wood can a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Similar : How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Only difference is the would and can. See it?