they would know the correct formla
Both a cook and a scientist require precision, experimentation, and attention to detail. A cook uses these skills to create delicious dishes by following recipes and techniques, while a scientist uses them to conduct experiments and analyze data to make new discoveries or advancements in knowledge. So, a cook could potentially make a good scientist with the right training and interest in scientific principles.
cook
No.
Some good careers in food would be a chef. Also another good one would be a cook. Also a waiter would be a good career for one who doesn't want to go through schools to become a chef or cook.
People that would be good at being a material scientist, are people that are good at science. Also people that are good at math. Because you need those two to be successful in anything with science.
it was capt James cook
A good cook can't cook another good cook's cookies becasue they've already been cooked by the other good cook.
if you are a very good cook then you would go for a dinner cook (chef), if your just a beginner then you would start out as a culinary chef
A good career would probably be a Scientist!!
Calling a scientist "chief" usually gets a good response. Calling a scientist a chief is as rewarding for them to hear as calling a swimmer a "dolphin".
No, there isn't a chance that a good cook would cook good if you told him/her to make an ice-cream sundae topped with whipped cream, jelly beans, and chocolate mounds with a side table of kiwi cut to look like spongebob. === Only if he or she is grammatically challenged.
An advanced degree in Chemistry would be a good start.