0
How Even though OSHA standards apply to the civilian workplace they have no jurisdiction over the Army?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does the army utilize trains?
The Department of Defense does, and has their own flatcars. They are pulled by civilian locomotives, though.
Does a civilian nurse make more than a navy nurse?
Yes, they earned only by a couple dollars though.
Was Darwin racist?
By modern standards, anyone from mid-Victorian English times would probably appear racist. By contempory standards though, he was liberal minded.
Is a desk with a chair the most ergonomic workplace?
The most ergonomic workplace would be something that is comfortable for you, so it can in fact be just a desk with a chair in an office. I'm sure you will want a computer hooked up, though, for work purposes.
Can personal jurisdiction be objected to at any point in federal court?
No, it must be made at a specific time before the case begins. If the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction is not made at that time, it is waived and personal jurisdiction is established even though it might not have existed in the first place. Check Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure.
Is twincest a good thing?
By most moral standards, not at all. Some cultures do promote it in some ways, though.
Make a sentence of live at?
Sometimes it seems as though I live at my workplace. Live at the MetroDome in downtown Miami tomorrow night only! It's the Kodiaks!
When does civilian law supersede military law?
Civilian law is typically always in place. Military law is only invoked in extreme emergencies. However, military personnel are always subject to military law. The Adjutant General will negotiate with the civilian authorities if there is any situation where it is not definite as to which takes precedence. Actually, in the United States, no military person (or, for that matter, anyone other than the Judical Branch) can arbitrarily decide to enforce military law in a place where it is not currently in place. Not even the President can decide to apply military law in a place where civil law is currently in force (indeed, this is one of the major contentious issues around the classification of terrorists as "enemy combatants", and the legality of this move is still being subject to litigation). The misnowmer "martial law" does not actually apply Military Law, but rather enforce a certain subsection of civilian law. For instance, let's say that there is major rioting in a city, and the National Guard is called in to restore order, and "martial law" is declared by the city's major (or perhaps, the state governor). Members of the National Guard are subject to Military law, and any infractions they commit will naturally be covered by military trial. HOWEVER, should a National Guardsman capture a looter (or other criminal), they are then prosecuted under CIVILIAN LAW, even though "martial law" was declared. Martial law in this case is a specific subsection of civilian law, which criminalizes certain activities which are normally permissible under ordinary civilian law. Back to the original question: as Congress is the creator of both military and civilian law, it can decide whether civilian or military law applies in a situation where the military normally has first jurisdiction. There are a myriad number of places this can occur, so naming them all is not possible. In addition, the Constitution is still the highest law of the land, and is supreme over both military and civilian law. Do note that many crimes are not covered by military law, but only civilian law, so it is entirely possible for a person normally subject to military jurisdiction to be prosecuted by civilian authorities without military acquiecence. For example, Insider Trading is a civilian crime, with no military equivalent, so it would be entirely possible to charge a military serviceperson on a military base with this civilian crime.
What is authority having jurisdiction?
This is a phrase that refers questions to the local level. For plumbing, the authority having jurisdiction would be the local plumbing inspector. Even though the plumbing code is provincial or state wide, all quibbles and interpretations are to be done by the local inspector.
Why isn't punctuation allowed on WikiAnswers?
it is allowed. You can't do a "dot dot dot" though because it could be inappropriate by their standards.
Why do some songs say explicit even though they don't swear?
The content of the song and the lyrics do not meet FCC standards.
Will the military train you to become a doctor even though you dont have the grades?
In brief, you must qualify based on the military standards, which are high.
