Both were rulers. The difference is Mughals stayed in India, British looted and left
Both Mughal and British rule in India were characterized by centralized authority, administrative systems, and military control. However, the Mughals ruled through a more decentralized system of governance with a focus on religious tolerance and cultural integration, while the British implemented a more direct and exploitative colonial administration that eventually led to Indian independence.
Some positive effects of British colonial rule include the introduction of modern infrastructure such as railways and roads, the establishment of a unified legal system, and the spread of the English language which has become a global lingua franca.
Before 1776, the American colonies were ruled by the British government under the system of colonial rule. This system allowed the British government to make decisions for the colonies and impose taxes on them without their representation in Parliament.
The Delhi Sultanate was a Muslim kingdom established in Delhi in the early 13th century, marked by centralized rule, military conquests, and Islamization of society. The Mughal Empire succeeded the Delhi Sultanate in the 16th century, known for its blend of Persian, Indian, and Central Asian cultures, administrative reforms, and cultural achievements like art and architecture. The Mughals ruled over a larger territory and their rule is characterized by greater stability and prosperity compared to the Delhi Sultanate.
Great Britain
To become a ruler in the Mughal Empire, you typically had to be a member of the ruling family, known as the Mughal dynasty. Succession was often based on primogeniture, where the eldest son inherited the throne. Additionally, political alliances and military conquests could also play a role in establishing oneself as a ruler.
the mughal power was respected a lot because of nostalgia and it was good for the british and noble people that the rule would stay forever
The British replaced the Mughal Empire in India.
First battle of panipat laid the foundation of Mughal rule in India.
They replace The Mughal Empire in China
what is comparison between mughal and british architaecture
Bahadur Shah Zafar was the Mughal emperor who was deported to Rangoon by the British.
Mughal Narbar did rule the Persian empire in the 1500s.
the lion shows us the bravery and iron hand which mughal and timur would use in their empires and rising sun indicates the growing empire.East India company was made by British in subcontinent and British also started to rule on some areas when British saw that the Mughals are fighting between each other.
the British
the british
Because its pappy
1. End of the rule of the Company2. Alteration In the British Policy towards the Indian States3. Conclusion of Peshwaship4. End of the Mughal Rule5. The Army was reorganized6. India was economically exploited7. Nationalism began to rise8. Introduction of Policy of Divide and Rule The impact of the Revolt :9. End of the rule of the Company10. Alteration in the British Policy towards the Indian States11. Conclusion of Peshwaship12. End of the Mughal Rule13. The Army was reorganized14. India was economically exploited15. Nationalism began to rise16. Introduction of Policy of Divide and Rule