Well, they both generate thermal pollution, but after they differ wildly.
nuclear power
Japan has few natural resources. They have to generate their electricity from imported fuels, primarily fossil (petrochemical) fuels. The nuclear reactor is an option to the use of fossil fuels to generate heat to generate electric power, and for Japan, an island nation, it was one that came with acceptable risks.
Nuclear energy does not rely on burning fossil fuels to generate electricity, which helps reduce the consumption of these limited resources. By using nuclear power as a clean alternative, we can preserve fossil fuels for other important uses such as transportation and heating.
The only similarity is that they are both used to generate electricity through use of heat engines.
Disposal of depleted nuclear fuels its self a pollution problem.
Disposal of depleted nuclear fuels its self a pollution problem.
becase there weird
Coal natural gas nuclear
geothermic wind solar hydro nuclear energy
Nuclear power plants generate electricity without burning fossil fuels, so do not release CO2, which causes climate change.
Bcoz burning of fossil fuels releases poisonous fuels which are harmful to human health....;)
no