0
How are human rights monitored and how are human rights treaties enforced?
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Do human rights get enforced?
no
Explain the historical development of human rights?
Explain the types of state duties imposed by all human rights treaties?
Which action was intended to promote human rights?
Ratifying international human rights treaties and conventions, establishing human rights commissions, and implementing laws and policies to protect human rights are all actions intended to promote human rights.
What Are Human rights Treaties on Religious issues?
indi ko alam
How do you xxplain what individual rights are?
They are human rights as defined by a country or internationally by the United Nations and international treaties.
Which document is a country's human rights stipulated?
A country's human rights are typically stipulated in its constitution or in international human rights treaties and conventions that the country has ratified.
Where can the most important protections of rights be found?
The most important protections of rights can typically be found in constitutions, international human rights treaties, and legal frameworks established by governments. These documents outline the fundamental rights and freedoms that individuals are entitled to, such as the right to life, liberty, and equality before the law. It is essential for these protections to be upheld and enforced to ensure the well-being and dignity of all individuals.
Ethiopia is a party to some international human rights law and not to others. Why do you think would be the reasons?
There could be several reasons why Ethiopia is a party to some international human rights laws but not to others. Some possible reasons are: Prioritization: Ethiopia may have prioritized certain human rights issues over others based on its own domestic concerns and needs. For example, Ethiopia may have ratified human rights treaties that are more closely related to issues such as economic development, poverty reduction, and social welfare, while choosing not to ratify treaties that address political rights, civil liberties, or cultural rights. Capacity: Ethiopia may lack the capacity to implement or enforce certain human rights standards. This could be due to factors such as limited resources, weak institutions, and lack of expertise or training. In such cases, Ethiopia may choose not to ratify treaties that it believes it cannot effectively implement. Political considerations: Ethiopia's decision to ratify or not ratify certain human rights treaties may also be influenced by political considerations. For example, the government may be hesitant to ratify treaties that could be seen as limiting its power or autonomy, or that could be perceived as interfering with its domestic policies or practices. International relations: Ethiopia's decision to ratify or not ratify certain human rights treaties may also be influenced by its relationships with other countries or international organizations. Ethiopia may choose to align itself with certain regional or global norms and values, or it may seek to maintain its independence and sovereignty by resisting pressure to conform to certain human rights standards. Overall, the decision to become a party to international human rights treaties is a complex one that involves balancing domestic priorities, institutional capacity, political considerations, and international relations.
Where can someone find information about the United Nations Convention on the rights of the child?
Information about children's rights can be found on the United Nations official website, in the "treaties" section, along with their official stances on many other human rights issues.
Why doesn't government of India pass a law forbidding couples for giving birth to more than two children?
I believe it is because it goes against human rights. I mean do people think the restricting people to two children is a good thing? It will make the Indian government look bad as it goes against human rights. It's more of a very last resort option. There are many reasons: How is it to be monitored and enforced? Forced abortion? Forced sterilization? What is the punishment for violation? What reaction would the people have? Would they overthrow the government?
Why were the apartheid in south America denied their human rights?
Black South Africans (not South Americans) were denied their human rights because the government at the time (run by the National Party) discriminated against them on racial grounds. These laws were unjustly enforced as blacks were thought to be inferior to whites.
How is state sovereignty an obstacle to human rights?
State sovereignty may be an obstacle to human rights when such rights are enacted at a supra-national level and implementation or defense of these rights requires sovereign states to enforce them. This creates a principal agent problem, where the interests of the state and the supra-national agency (e.g.) the United Nations) diverge, and the state disregards the agency because it profits off that choice. However, state sovereignty may support human rights when human rights are enacted and enforced by the state itself (which occurs frequently in advanced, Western democracies).
