They aren't. Intelligent design posits that natural selection cannot create life as we know it, and inserts a deity as the cause.
Stabilizing selection occurs when the extreme forms of some trait are selected against by natural selection. It is a force of natural selection which causes evolution (definition: change of allele frequency in a population divided by time).
If we're evolving and evolved from monkeys or apes then why is there still monkeys and apes. We did not evolve from apes or monkeys. We branched off a common line. Humans did not evolve from apes. Humans and apes had a common ancestor . Apes evolved in one direction and we evolved in another. We probably looked a lot alike at first.
Although ID has undoubtedly become a somewhat political phenomenon, it did not begin this way. Philip Johnson, another promoter of ID conceived of it, as do others such as Michael Behe as a concept which is critical in a negative sense of existing evolutionary paradigms. The evidence used by Behe relates to the possibility of complex biological systems, which he describes as irreducibly complex, arising by the chance mechanisms of evolution. Since all the parts of these systems are required to be in place for the sytem to operate, the process of natural selection would select against the devlopment of these complex systems while they were being 'built' by the slow and gradual process of evolution. In this sense, ID was put forward largely as a critique of evolution and points to a number of different examples which are inexplainable under current evolutionary thought. Currently there is no scientific explanation as to how the genetic information required to 'build' these structures could arise spontaneously through evolutiuonary processes. Further to this, the science of genetics, in line with the laws of thermodynamics point to mutations as unable to add new genetic information, although recombination and duplication certainly occur, as well as certain genes being 'switched off' or 'on' with resultant effects in living things. ID theorists, although themselves criticizing evolution, or the current understanding of it, in turn come in for criticism from both evolutionists and creationists alike. The former, because they are criticizing the theory of evolution, the latter for the ID theorists reticence to name the designer.
There alike by their descendants and experiences the same kind of natural disasters.
They are Natural Resources.
It actually spelled, selecionar, which means selection the letters selecion should give you a clue because selecionar and selection look alike
No Selena Gomez is a pretty intelligent woman and Taylor Laughtner is a boy with jiggles not abs and is preverted.
They are both natural disasters.
trees give off a natural gas which is oxygen that helps us breath
answar plz :?
The theory of natural selection is based on the following assumptions about the nature of living things: 1. All organisms produce more offspring than can survive. 2. No two organisms are exactly alike. 3. Among organisms, there is a constant struggle for survival. 4. Individuals that possess favorable characteristics for their environment have a higher rate of survival and produce more offspring. 5. Favorable characteristics become more common in the species, and unfavorable characteristics are lost.
The saying "great minds think alike" is a common English proverb of unknown origin. It implies that intelligent or thoughtful individuals often have the same ideas or opinions.