Not being able to read or be poor is no excuse! Pretty much everyone has a TV these days and even poor and illiterate ppl watch. Just like everyone else they have to try to see through the BS. There's info on TV if you want to watch it and there's BS in the mags if you want to read that. Just because you are poor and can't read doesn't mean you're dumb so the choice is what to believe in. Because that is a choice. And Obama was elected because he's the only way out! A sign he was the right one was that all the rulers in the world was hoping you would choose him.
The poor and illiterate are deeply exploited during election time, with out the news to find out anything, it's word of mouth, and the disadvantaged are plunged into a pool of ignorance, oblivious to what is actually going on in the world, whoever everyone else in their country bumpkin town likes. The candidates use this cruel tactic to their advantage. How do you think Obama won?
Illiterate and poor people can be exploited during elections through various means. This can include manipulation or coercion by political parties or candidates, misinformation or disinformation campaigns, vote-buying or bribery, or even threats or intimidation. In some cases, illiterate and poor individuals may be easily influenced or coerced due to their vulnerability or lack of access to information, making them targets for exploitation during elections.
Not being able to read or be poor is no excuse! Pretty much everyone has a TV these days and even poor and illiterate ppl watch. Just like everyone else they have to try to see through the BS. There's info on TV if you want to watch it and there's BS in the mags if you want to read that. Just because you are poor and can't read doesn't mean you're dumb so the choice is what to believe in. Because that is a choice. And Obama was elected because he's the only way out! A sign he was the right one was that all the rulers in the world was hoping you would choose him. The poor and illiterate are deeply exploited during election time, with out the news to find out anything, it's word of mouth, and the disadvantaged are plunged into a pool of ignorance, oblivious to what is actually going on in the world, whoever everyone else in their country bumpkin town likes. The candidates use this cruel tactic to their advantage. How do you think Obama won?
Not being able to read or be poor is no excuse! Pretty much everyone has a TV these days and even poor and illiterate ppl watch. Just like everyone else they have to try to see through the BS. There's info on TV if you want to watch it and there's BS in the mags if you want to read that. Just because you are poor and can't read doesn't mean you're dumb so the choice is what to believe in. Because that is a choice. And Obama was elected because he's the only way out! A sign he was the right one was that all the rulers in the world was hoping you would choose him.The poor and illiterate are deeply exploited during election time, with out the news to find out anything, it's word of mouth, and the disadvantaged are plunged into a pool of ignorance, oblivious to what is actually going on in the world, whoever everyone else in their country bumpkin town likes. The candidates use this cruel tactic to their advantage. How do you think Obama won?Read more: How_are_the_illiterate_people_and_poor_people_exploited_at_the_time_of_election
In third world countries, educational systems are poor and many citizens are illiterate. An illiterate person is one who can't read.
Not all of them. The poor commoners were illiterate. The rich ones and the middling income ones, instead, could afford an education.
The poor and lower class was exploited by the middle class. They were at the most disadvantage since the beginning of the nation.
None. She grew up poor and illiterate and was married at 15.
as a result they are not given admissions in schools and they remain illiterate
becoz many people in india are poor, stupid-villagers, illiterate and they are not aware of the importance of water thats why britishers make fun of them..:P
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs
No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs
No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs