They have the same DNA.
because if there is absolutely no dfference then they might be mistaken for clones.
No, fraternal twins are not clones. Fraternal twins occur when two separate eggs are fertilized by two separate sperm, resulting in two genetically unique individuals. Clones are genetically identical individuals created through asexual reproduction or artificial techniques like somatic cell nuclear transfer.
The DNA of identical twins and of clones is, apart from random, environmentally produced mutations, 100% identical. The only difference is that clones are produced on purpose through advanced bioengineering techniques while identical twins happen as an accident of nature. Identical twins are, in a sense, natural clones.
Identical twins, due to the fact that the one fertilized egg splits, have identical DNA. Fraternal twins, since they are from separate eggs, have different DNA.
Well just because they are identical twins doesn't mean that they are the same person.
do think scient try to creat art ficial twins
They are twins!
The sisters could be the result of two separate sets of identical twins who married each other and had children. This would mean that genetically, the sisters are siblings, but due to the unique combination of DNA from both sets of twins, they appear very similar in appearance and age.
If they were not then they would not be called identical twins!
no. every human has different fingerprints, twins or not
In the human population, clones are referred to as identical twins. Identical twins occur naturally when a fertilized egg splits into two separate embryos, resulting in two individuals with the same genetic makeup. Cloning, on the other hand, refers to the artificial creation of an identical copy of an organism.
They are virtually indistinguishable, as if they were clones or identical twins. Claudius mixes them up and Gertrude has to set him straight