because mix breeding and new speice
Sustainability of environmental data is unchanged by the removal of dogs from their employment on the continent. PS: There is no such animal as 'Antarctic Husky'.
Antarctica
Scientists and researchers in Antarctica live a lifestyle that is supported by their government. This lifestyle includes the import of everything consumed and used and the export of everything wasted and expired. There is no 'sustainability' in Antarctica such as is expected on more productive continents.
That would depend on the fisherman and what s/he would want to develop on the continent of Antarctica.
There is no 'oil state' currently in Antarctica, nor will one be developed according to the Antarctic Treaty.
Antarctica is home only to scientists, and for short periods of time. These scientists live in the "bases" developed by their countries.
Sustainability
There is no commercial extraction of natural resources from the Antarctic continent as exists on the other six continents. Antarctica's 'natural research' is scientific data, and since data is factual and constant, there are no sustainability issues related to gathering it.
Humans are not native to Antarctica, so there would be no legends developed.
Sustainability is when you maintain a certain area or place at a length without interruption or weakening it for the future. So we can manage Antarctica sustainably by allowing only scientist do there job there and by banning tourists and fishermen as tourists increase the risk of pollution and damage and fishermen could increase the chance of extinction of antarctic fishes by overfishing.
No one.It's too cold to make any industry viable.