In the computer age, it becomes feasible in some countries to accept the original Athenian example from 2,500 years ago, of direct democracy where citizens vote on all matters, and the council implemented those decisions.
A theoretically great idea of extreme democracy a la technology. However we should also learn from the Athenian failure. The citizens were swayed by cunning and manipulatice political leaders, which brought down the state in war and dissention. Systems of representative democracy, even with all their weaknesses and faults, are far safer and more effective in handling the complexities of modern societies.
The reforms that expanded democracy in newly industrialized societies were legislative reforms that provided for public voting, reformed local government, other structures in the insurance, education and finance sector.
Robert La Follette expanded democracy by championing the "Wisconsin idea" which pioneered Workmen's Compensation and minimum wage legislation. He pushed forward corporate and railroad regulations along with progressive taxation. He favored an expanded political democracy to allow people to move toward economic democracy.
Democracy , Women's rights , Development of Infrastructure, Development of Social Services ( such as Education and Healthcare)
The Greek statesman Pericles then expanded the democracy. He was an Athenian statesman who had an impact on politics that remains today.
Democracy in the U.S. expanded through the extension of voting rights, notably with the 15th Amendment, which granted African American men the right to vote, and the 19th Amendment, which extended voting rights to women. Additionally, the introduction of direct election of senators through the 17th Amendment allowed citizens to have a more direct influence on their representation in Congress, further strengthening democratic participation.
democracy, being the center command in central Europe in the late 1979's when Apalapacho took control of Indonesia and expanded north to America
Athenian democracy and the democratic system of the United States differ in several key ways. Athenian democracy was a direct democracy where citizens voted on laws and policies directly, while the U.S. has a representative democracy where citizens elect officials to make decisions on their behalf. Additionally, Athenian democracy was limited to male citizens, while the U.S. has expanded voting rights to include women and minorities. Both systems value citizen participation and the protection of individual rights, but they operate in different ways to achieve these goals.
Both helped expand democracy, but the Nineteenth expanded the franchise (vote). The Seventeenth Amendment was passed in 1913 and provides for the direct (popular) election of senators. The Nineteenth Amendment was passed in 1920 and allowed women to vote.
Aristotle expanded on Plato's ideas by distinguishing between good and bad forms of tyranny and democracy. He believed that tyranny was the rule of one individual in their own self-interest, whereas democracy was the rule of the majority for the common good. Aristotle also emphasized the importance of a strong middle class in maintaining stable and just forms of government.
The first limited democracy was established by Cleisthenes in 507 BCE. It disappeared when the aristocrats took over to repel the Persian invasion, and was restored by Ephialtes in 460 BCE. He was assassinated for doing this, and his protégé Pericles took over and extended it to a radical democracy which shifted all control to the popular assembly. This lasted until Athens' defeat in the Peloponnesian War in 404 BCE, after which Athens returned to a directed democracy.
Personally, I think that democracy expanded in Athens and not Sparta, because Athens had a different kind of government from the start and democracy worked for them. Sparta was more military based and were always prepared to fight war. This is just the type of system they had. Oddly, their city-state vanished without trace after the Peloponnesian war. Doesn't that say something good about democracies? Athens had a better system. Overall, both city-states saw their way fit and the other one was wrong. Why would you try your enemies kind of government instead of sticking with your own? This must be what the Spartans thought.
Historians have differed in their interpretation of Jacksonian Democracy. Some portray it as a democratic revolution that expanded political participation and protected the common man's interests, while others criticize it for its limited commitment to equality and its policies that reinforced racial and gender hierarchies. Additionally, historians debate whether Jacksonian Democracy was primarily a grassroots movement or if it was driven by elite interests and political manipulation. Overall, these different perspectives reflect the complex and contested nature of Jacksonian Democracy.