A nuclear weapon can be beneficial in that the owner countries of weapons are much less likely to attack each other. For instance, the US and Russia never directly attacked each other during the cold war, despite the incredible antagonistic bent of the two countries toward each other. The reason for this is that both countries practiced something called mutually assured destruction (MAD) this polity asserts that if one country launches missiles at the other, the attacked country will immediately start a full counterattack on the country that launched the missiles originally, ensuring the complete destruction of both countries. This may sound like a bad thing (and it is if it ever happened) this policy prevented war during the cold war.
The meaning of the word nuclear weapon, is a weapon that has a nuclear warhead on it.
something that is not good for the planet
Because ww3 is around the corner and they dont want to be without any weapons. Nuclear weapons are a weapon but also a very good deterant
This nuclear weapon is called an atomic bomb or a nuclear bomb
Nuclear weapon detonations
If by "bomb" you mean a conventional explosive weapon, then the nuclear weapon is more powerful.
nuclear chemicals such as plutonium
No. LLNL even tested several Uranium-Hydride bombs in the 1950s. Even though their computer models said the devices should explode, none gave a nuclear yield. One could use the waste from the reactor as a Radiological Weapon, but the reactor itself is not useful as a weapon.
plutonium + weapon
NO
no
the first nuclear weapon was issued in WW2 created by the americans in a chicargo squash court