To date there is no knowledge of anyone making a real time machine. With or without 1.21 gigawatts.
Characters can be real or fake. There can be scientists in the story or fake people
we have created many breeds of dogs cats hamsters you name it so maybe if we breed other animals to at least make something like a pikachu
It's a real anime, yes and also real cards but i don't think "Yu-Gi-Oh!" will make real motorcycles.
There are biologists and astronomers and also there are geologists, zoologists, meteorologists, for starters. There are also physicists, theoretical physicists, several different kinds of earth scientists, medical scientists, behavioral scientists, botanists and agricultural scientists, social scientists. There are computer and information scientists, scientists who work with and create mathematical models of real and hypothetical processes, and probably hundreds more if you want to break things down to the most minute level. Most sciences will fit into one of the categories above, and there may be several other general categories. This is only touching upon the array of sciences without even getting into the engineering fields that have come out of them.
NO!
Probably not.
Huh? I don't know. That is a random question. We don't have the technology and the brains to develop a machine that will make things of fantasy become real things.
No, not yet. but someone could make one.
...to make predictions. Scientists will then compare their predictions to what happens in the real world. If their predictions equaled what happened in reality, the model is good. If the predictions were different, the scientists know they have to refine the model to better predict what will happen.
Copy And Print On A Copy Machine
Yes, they can also make Naruto real, if that's going to be your next question. Sarcasm intended.
In ideal machine input is equal to output . The efficiency of ideal machine is 100% . In real machine input is not equal to output .The efficiency of ideal machine in not 100% . In ideal machine there is no lose of energy . In real machine there is lose of energy . In real machine there is no friction . While in real machine there is friction .
No. But scientists might be researching how to make one. If there was, probably used Liquid Nitrogen.
Because there are too many parameters in real life to take into account.
Scientists believe so but we would have to have a room full of equipment. As a matter of fact, Berkley scientists have created a working plasma arc generator, which behaves quite a lot like a lightsaber. But, as mentioned above, it's difficult to make it handheld, as it uses immense amounts of power and takes a large machine to function.
Never says the amount of plutonium, but it says 1.21 jigawatts of power are needed. (yes, the real unit is gigawatts, but this is how Doc pronounces it)
A real machine is like an ideal machine in that there are no massless chains or frictionless bearings. The parts of an ideal machine are rigid and weightless.