If the mass proportions of the original substances do not equal these definite proportions, there will something of one of the original substances be left over. Note that this is special, it could as well have turned out to be possible for substances to combine in any proportion. So we find the law of definite proportions. Now we should be baffled and wonder how on Earth could that be so? And then we could think of substances being made of small particles (atoms) or groups of such particles (molecules) to explain the laws of nature that we found. So the laws of definite proportions and multiple proportions are (partially) proof for the existence of atoms which combine into molecules. The laws are the real thing and atoms and molecules and their chemical formulas are the ideas we make to understand the laws.
The existence of atoms explains the law of definite proportions by suggesting that chemical substances are made up of atoms that combine in fixed ratios. Each atom has a specific mass and combining these atoms in fixed proportions leads to compounds with consistent ratios of elements. This consistency supports the law of definite proportions, which states that a compound will always contain the same elements in the same ratio by mass.
The law of definite proportions, the law of conservation of mass, and the law of multiple proportions all provide evidence for the existence of atoms.
compound
The stoichiometry is governed by the laws of definite proportions and multiple proportions.
No. A compound is a mixture of different elements. They can be in different proportions. Examples are CH3 and CH4.
A formula that gives the ratio of elements in a compound is called an empirical formula. On the other hand, the formula that shows the number of atoms in each element present in a molecule is called a molecular formula.
The law of definite proportions, the law of conservation of mass, and the law of multiple proportions all provide evidence for the existence of atoms.
If the mass proportions of the original substances do not equal these definite proportions, there will something of one of the original substances be left over. Note that this is special, it could as well have turned out to be possible for substances to combine in any proportion. So we find the law of definite proportions. Now we should be baffled and wonder how on Earth could that be so? And then we could think of substances being made of small particles (atoms) or groups of such particles (molecules) to explain the laws of nature that we found. So the laws of definite proportions and multiple proportions are (partially) proof for the existence of atoms which combine into molecules. The laws are the real thing and atoms and molecules and their chemical formulas are the ideas we make to understand the laws.
Jeremias Benjamin Richter was the first to develop titration and the law of definite proportions. This law proved the existence of atoms.
Compounds are composed of atoms of different elements chemically bonded in definite proportions. The components of mixtures are not chemically combined and they do not have definite proportions.
By the law of definite proportions.
compound
Generally yes (the law of definite proportions); as exceptions - nonstoichiometric compounds.
He deduced that from the law of definite proportions.
the law of definite proportions
The stoichiometry is governed by the laws of definite proportions and multiple proportions.
Yes, atoms have a definite volume.
John Dalton wrote four essays called "Experimental Essays" based on his "Atomic Theory", which explained matter as consisting of discrete atoms, that there was one type of atom for each element, and that the compounds were made of combinations of different types of atoms in fixed proportions.