Want this question answered?
yes, but not by much
yes
No its not real wana be stronger gotta work for it
Basing on the credibility of the individual or organization, Banker assures (assurance is no guarentee as per Law ?) and counter signs on their behalf as a second signatory. This is indemnity bond. Banker takes margin money and basing on the limits available to the industry, banker issues bank guarentee. In this case, Banker is the first signatory which is more stronger in terms of payment to the concerned. Any comments Please!....chandiprasad
Predatory pricing
The meetings and rallies were held every month and they usually evoked great enthusiasm and excitement. And probabaly, great enthusiasm and excitement lead to the stronger support of Hitler.
The meetings and rallies were held every month and they usually evoked great enthusiasm and excitement. And probabaly, great enthusiasm and excitement lead to the stronger support of Hitler.
its stronger and is expands
Home-ground advantage - along with the stronger war-mission that went with it, driving out the invader.
Because pro-slavery feelings were stronger in the Deep South. In the Upper South, there was less enthusiasm for secession.
Because pro-slavery feelings were stronger in the Deep South. In the Upper South, there was less enthusiasm for secession.
They don't, they just give you a mechanical advantage.
stronger security
There is no mechanical advantage. It's a directional advantage. You change the direction of the force to be applied to your advantage, so you can use stronger muscles, a beast of burden, etc.
no its only advantage is its claws and if it didn't have them it would be defenseless
In this case Boxers have the advantage of being bigger than Bulldogs and consiquently stronger, however if English Bulldogs were to be scaled up to the same size as boxers Bulldogs would probably be stronger.
A lion is smaller than a polar bear and the polar bear has a height and weight advantage, so a polar bear is stronger.