Unions were quite important after the robber baron turn of the century when auto workers, miners and other large industries were taken advantage by big business denying them fair pay and safe working conditions. Unions today have less to worry about when it comes to workplace safety, unfair labor practices and when you add in the anti monopoly laws you can compete for jobs in other companies. It's the competition part that unions seem to have issue with. A worker, regardless of talent, commitment or work ethic makes the same as any other worker with the same amount of time in the union. Add in collective bargaining, slow downs, wildcat strikes and picket lines you can see why business owners would rather not deal with unions. Getting into public service worker unions like fire, police, state, county or city workers they have held these communities hostage in order to get an advantage in wage and benefit negotiations. The problem here is instead of a private business these large unions are asking for more tax payer money. And in turn unanimously support one political group over another in order to get public service favors. That makes them a political target. Union membership has steadily fallen for decades. One could categorize them as a dying institution but they aren't going without a fight. Another reason why a new company would not want to deal with union bosses.
Regulating business was un-American Union leaders were anarchists Unions threatened profits.
The workers went on strike
The last result was a strike.
Sample Response: Business owners need their workers to effectively run the businesses. Unions represent many of the workers. Therefore, if an owner cannot reach an agreement with a union, the owner knows the business will suffer. ~APEX
In disputes between workers and business owners, government often supported owners
Unions were weak and the government worked together with business the supreme court sided with business owners The economy was strong and unions were weak.
Yes it can. If it is negative it means the business has a cumulative loss. It has the effect of reducing the owners' funds in the balance sheet.
Unions found it hard to fight government -s upported owners. (APEX)
Unions threatened profits.
Unions found it hard to fight government-supported owners.
Unions existed in New York City both before and after the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire. Public reaction to the fire strengthened some of them. Business owners did not "allow" unions, they were generally forced to accept them after strikes. Of course, sometimes the strikes failed and those workplaces were not unionized at that time.
Growth in the number of union members was seen as a threat to business owners because as membership increased, so did the level of influence unions could exert on owners when negotiating conditions of service, wage rates etc. Some enlightened owners recognised that unions could provide a platform for building better relationship's between employer and employee and welcomed responsible workers organisations. Over the decades, their power became too strong resulting in unreasonable and unsustainable demands and in the UK in the 1980's the then Thatcher/Tory government sought to curb the excesses and power of the unions with a good deal of success and they no longer have the power they once held. With the arrival of austerity in the UK however, there are signs of renewed interest in the such movements.