State control of religion is associated with religious control of state, although the latter is usually more subtle. Some people of strong religious faith may regard a degree of religious influence in politics to be a good thing, but overlook the consequent risk of the state influencing religion.
One way to avoid state control of religion is to be alert to any attempts by religion to control the political agenda. Another is to make the political leaders aware that we want a clear separation of church and state.
no
To guarantee freedom of and from religion.
France does not have an official religion. France is a secular state. In fact, the French government recognizes NO religion, at it has the policy of total laicity, which means that religion is completely separate from the state.
Whilst it is impossible to separate the faith of a person from what he/she does in daily life, and whilst many civil laws are based on religious tenets e.g. no murder or stealing (Ten Commandments) many people believe it is important to keep the institutional side religion and state separate for a number of reasons: 1) To ensure that everyone has the freedom to practise a religion (or not); this right was not respected in most Communist nations. 2) To ensure that people do not have to follow any particular religion; this right was something that some European monarchs e.g. Henry VIII, did not respect. 3) To ensure that government is not unduly influenced by any particular religion which would result in people of other religions suffering discrimination e.g. it is against the law in Saudi Arabia for a Muslim to become a Christian. Some people argue against the separation of religion and state, saying that: 1) Without the influence of religion, the state loses any sense of morality. 2) Many civil laws are based on religious laws. 3) Civil law should always reflect, and be subordinate to, divine law. Most Christian denominations support the practice of keeping state and religion institutionally separate. However, those such as Catholicism and Anglicanism believe that they have the duty to speak out on matters they consider to be of great importance such as immigration, justice and abortion.
It means that religion is separate from politics and goverment.
People should have the freedom to pick their own religion and not be forced to be what ever religion is mandated by the government.
It really does not. The 1st Amendment says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". It does not separate Church and State (although many people seem to think it does). It merely says that Congress may not establish a religion, or keep you from exercising your religion.
Anabaptist. It was during the reformation.
Because it is the opiate of the masses and how else will the church and state control the people?
From memory I think it is Vatican City. Hope this helps. A$
Yes, the U.S. government mostly follows the constitution about religion. Church and state are separate, but God is still mentioned on money and in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Secularism is the principle of separation between government institutions and religious institutions. It advocates for a state that remains neutral in matters of religion, allowing individuals the freedom to practice any religion or no religion at all. This principle is typically upheld in democratic societies to ensure the protection of religious freedom and prevent the establishment of a state religion.