A band can avoid copyright issues by performing and recording only songs written entirely by its own members. The caveat is, if one of those members leaves, there needs to be an agreement in place to determine the disposition of the rights to their songs.
Each issue would have its own copyright information; the first issue would be 2002.
Replicating a signature is less a copyright issue and more a fraud issue.
Each issue or edition has its own copyright information.
Saying something has a "copyright issue" is usually a nice, slightly oblique way of saying "copyright infringement." For example, if a YouTube video is taken down because of copyright issues, it means the rightsholder of some portion of it has asserted that the use is infringing.
P2P is both a security issue (personal and computer security) and because so much intellectual property is uploaded illegally on p2p networks it is also a copyright issue.
The copyright holder or an appointed administrator can issue a license.
No. There is nothing inherently illegal in the software. It only becomes a copyright issue when the software is use to distribute protected intellectual property without permission.
This is more likely to be a contract law issue than a copyright issue; agreements between schools and vendors can be incredibly complicated.
there was no constitutional issue, it was a copyright infringement and vicarious liability issue.
Almo Music.
Using NFL or team logos requires a license; this is an issue of trademark, rather than copyright.
Not at the moment, but it is frequently discussed. You can sign up for email updates from the Copyright Office in order to stay abreast of the issue.