Scientific information should be based on reliable published sources and, it should receive limited weight according to its acceptance.
Yes, Scientific American is generally considered a reliable source for scientific information due to its rigorous editorial process and reputation for publishing accurate and credible research.
LOL - in my experience, very little of the information you receive from popular media is ever reliable. They rely on sensationalism and 'sale-ability.
It helps if you know a bit about the corresponding scientific area.
textbook apexC: V.H.<3
Information that is presented as scientific but has not been gathered through reliable scientific methods or Implausible or untestable scientific claims
The only media that is reliable is that found in scientific journals.
You can get accurate and reliable information about breast cancer on health organization sites. Another place to receive accurate and reliable information on this topic would be from an actual doctors office that performs mammograms.
Information that is presented as scientific but has not been gathered through reliable scientific methods or Implausible or untestable scientific claims
A scientist should look for the most recent and reliable information from their fellow scientists. The best way to get recent information is to go to the people who have most recently gotten it.
to publish the information first in order to receive appropriate credit.
A peer-reviewed scientific journal is likely to provide the most reliable scientific information about a new dietary supplement. These journals undergo a rigorous evaluation process by experts in the field to ensure that the research presented is high quality and credible.
a scientific paper is a reliable source of information - apex