Its on the most popular systems, and FPS (first person shooters) are a highly prized genre. Graphics, controls, campaign, and replay-ability are key factors when criticizing a game
I'd say it is not a good game at all. i bought my son it for his birthday and he hates it. its one of the worst call of duty games. ( id say call of duty 1 is better)
that is call of duty 1 it is a very good game :) Cookie Monsta
no its not good dan call of duty modern warfare 3 its the best game of 2011
call of duty is a better game for online multyplayer, but if you like a good campain with good graphics go with MOH
Call Of Duty 4 Modern Warfare
yes
black ops
YA but not as good as black ops!!
Killzone 2 has very good graphics and I think that is is made for the experienced first person shooter. Call of duty 4 is probably one of the best shooter game that I have ever played. The Call of duty series is one of the only series that is enjoyed by experienced and non-experienced players. Another point is that Call of duty 4 is (I think) the best online game on the PS3 or the X-Box 360. I have had Call of duty 4 since I got the PS3 a year ago and alough Call of duty 5 has come out I still play Call of duty 4 online. So I would say that Call of duty 4 is the best but killzone 2 is still a very good game
There is no real answer to this question, people have their ways of becoming good and what not. Call of Duty is known for almost having the same game play each game they release. Personally, I played from Call of Duty 4, so I got used to the game play that does not change. If you are a new player to Call of Duty, you can use combat training or even play the campaign to get better.
Call of Duty: Black ops is a great game if you like first person shooter games. But, I think Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 is slightly better. It all depends on your opinion.
call of duty 5