More of the organisms would benefit and the others would be affected, or becoming more vicious about foodfor the living things.
The world could feed a bigger population.
Its over ninethousand
Things that effect population are competition for food, also known as survival of the fittest. Starvation, hunting, and over population.
The loss of an important population of animals or plants could create a ripple effect throughout the ecosystem. It may disrupt food chains, alter habitat structure, and lead to imbalances in population dynamics. This could ultimately impact biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and the services provided by the ecosystem.
if the predator is over populated then the prey might become extincit
There was more food
The amount of food determines the population of a species. Less food equals fewer members of the species, and more food means a greater population of a species can be supported.
water/ food will effect the pigeon population b/c the water and food is good for the pigeon
If the population of mice is reduced due to disease, their predators may experience a decrease in food supply, leading to potential population decline among them. Conversely, the population of plants and insects that mice prey on could see an increase, which may impact other species further down the food web.
The effects animals have on others are that if a primary consumer's population runs out then the secondary consumer has no food. Soooo in other words they effect each other by food.
Water or the lack of it. All humans require FRESH water, if it is not readily available the the population does not survive.
If the shrimp population increased, it could lead to overgrazing of algae and sea grasses, disrupting the ecosystem balance. This could impact other species that rely on these habitats for food and shelter, causing a ripple effect throughout the food chain. Additionally, the increased competition for resources among the shrimp themselves could lead to decreased individual fitness and growth rates.