The implications that it is morally repugnant are something that also came with the invention of IVF. In the '60s and '70s 85% of Americans thought it should be illegal. They claimed it was unsafe, families would be destroyed, and it was against God's will. These are the same exact arguments of those opposing cloning. All their opinions changed when they saw Louie Brown, the first child born using IVF. People noticed he was totally normal. Why should the same not be true for cloning?
Its bad because it's unnatural. But so are polio vaccines! Cloning parts for people to save their lives could be a good thing!
A good Christians view on cloning is no. No cloning.
possibly
Its bad because it's unnatural. But so are polio vaccines! Cloning parts for people to save their lives could be a good thing!
when saying symptoms meaning stuff clonage might do then clonage can actually might help cancer and other types of diseases by getting the healthy part of organism and cloning it to cure and clean
It could help solve cures for cancer or anyother illnesses.
What is wrong with cloning?
the cons of cloning is it could destroy human kind
Good
The good thing is that you could use your clone for things you cant make time for. the bad thing is that someone might find out and you could get arrested.
yes and no.
Your teacher.