I don't think it can be derived.
With the help of a Jedi, Only joking if it is Newtons your referring to it could be a Newton meter
Newton's 1st Law: If F = 0 then object is at rest or in a uniform rectilinear motion.Newton's 2nd Law: F = ma.Starting from Newton's second Law: F = ma, if F = 0 then a = 0 then v = constant. then the object is either at rest (v = 0 = constant) or in a uniform rectilinear motion (v=constant).This is what is widespread, but wait...Newton is not stupid! If his First Law could be derived from his second law, so why he stated it as separate law?!There is a common misconception about Newton's first law. The correct statement of Newton's first law is:"In the absence of forces, it is possible to specify a frame of reference where the object is either at rest, or in a uniform rectilinear motion. This frame of reference is called inertial frame of reference".Notice that! Newton's first law central point is to define inertial frame of reference, and guarantee that such frame exists.Absolutely, There is no way to derive this from newton's second law.Hope you best times.You may contact me at: vina.vinarue.rue@gmail.comNewton's 1st Law is derived from the 2nd Law F=ma, by setting F to zero, 0=ma,thus a=o/m or no force, no acceleration.
19 Newtons They need to be in the same direction for the highest resultant
In science, action refers to the process of exerting a force on an object that causes a change in its state of motion or rest. It is typically measured in units such as Newtons and involves the interaction between objects or systems.
There is no specific term or concept known as "killer newtons." It could possibly be a misunderstanding or misspelling of a different term.
The second law is about how the force affects the motion. A relatively small force could make, say, a tennis ball accelerate a lot (e.g. changing its direction completely), but could not make the motion of, for example, a truck change very much. This is because the mass of the objects are very different. Similarly, if two objects had the same mass, a large force would change the motion a lot, where as a small force not so much. So the change in motion depends on the size of the force and the mass of the object.
Isaac Newton's first law of motion deals with forces and changes in velocity. For just a moment, let us imagine that you can apply only one force to an object. That is, you could choose push the object to the right or you could choose to push it to the left, but not to the left and right at the same time, and also not up and to the right at the same time, and so on.
If you divide 195 pounds by 2.2, you could convert it into kilograms. So 195 pounds is equal to 88.45kg. The standard acceleration due to gravity on Earth's surface is approximately 9.807(meters per second squared). And the mass here is 88.45kg. Now you can use the formula F=ma So, F=(88.45kg) x (9.807(meters per second squared)) Then F= 867.4 (kilogram meters per second squared-which is the same as Newtons) So F= 867.4N (Newtons) Hope that wasn't confusing. I tried to make it as straightforward as possible.
A violation of Newton's 1st law of motion would be any situation where an object does not remain at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by an external force. This could occur if an object started moving without any force acting on it, or if an object kept moving without any external force to sustain its motion.
It all depends on the fuels available energy, the mass of the craft, and any force the craft may have to overcome (see Newtons second law of motion). Also, although it'd take a while one could conceivably cross the entire universe on one gallon. As long as nothing counteracts the force of the propellant the craft will never stop (see Newtons first law of motion).
'500n' could potentially refer to 500 newtons, which is a unit of force in the metric system. It is equivalent to the force required to accelerate a one-kilogram mass at a rate of one meter per second squared.
Newton explained Kepler's laws of planetary motion using his laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation. Newton showed that Kepler's laws could be derived from his own laws, providing a cohesive and comprehensive explanation for the motion of planets in the solar system. By combining these theories, Newton was able to show that a single set of principles could explain both terrestrial and celestial motion.