This is a highly theoretical issue, but if I were to advise someone who lived in Salem in the 17th century and had been accused of witchcraft, I would tell that person to leave town, and move to some very distant location. It was never possible to prove that you are nota witch. That would require a much more sane group of people than the good citizens of Salem.
religious...they wanted to escape from the church, and to escape from being prosecuted for what they believe in
Four years old.
Harry Salem has written: 'Inhalation Toxicology' 'Being #1 at being #2'
Abigail Williams is most famous for being one of the people that accused people of being witches in Salem. The Salem Witch Trials of 1692 lead to the arrest of 150 innocent people. Abigail Williams is knows for being the first person to accuse someone of witchcraft.
The Rwanda Genocide was one of the most disturbing events in the history of Africa. As a result hundreds of people were prosecuted for taking part in it. There is currently no one still being prosecuted as a result of this event.
Those being prosecuted for war crimes.
They must blame someone else of being a witch
Yes, a person can be prosecuted for a crime committed in another country if the crime is considered illegal in both the country where it was committed and the country where the person is being prosecuted. This is known as extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Because most of the time the religious people just say they are being prosecuted because of their religious beliefs, and the law lets them off
In the late 17th century, Salem was a massively important port city. Most exports of the colonies would either go to Salem before being sent to Europe or taken south into the Caribbean by a ship whose home port was at Salem. Trade doesn't stop for witch trials.
The defendant. The one being accused of a crime.
Because the quackers were being severly prosecuted at the time ...;(