in medieval times one of the major types of warfare was sedge so in order to continue to rule the nobles added things like murder holes and arrow slits to cause damage to the attacking army and walls and moats to keep them out.
Medieval castles were neither good nor bad; they simply were. They were defensive fortifications within which the inhabitants could defend against invaders and from which the owner of the castle could impose his rule on the surrounding countryside. Today, the surviving medieval castles are good tourist attractions.
During the winter there could be as many as between 1,000 and 1,500 people at court, and in summer when many courtiers were away at their estates there could be as few as about 800. So yes the medieval castles had courts.
If you have access to google, click on images, type in medieval castles, then press 'google search'. If not, you could click on the link below named "Castle Images:google".
So that they could be protected during times of war
Many castles had moats, steep embankments or other natural defenses. Castle defense was often a matter of waiting out the attackers - many castles had their own water supply. Artillery, which could destroy walls, made castles obsolete.
Castles usually took 7-12 years to build, but bigger ones could take up to 20 years! There would be medieval craftsmen that did masonry, sculpt the huge stone blocks and also architects who would design the castles themselves. Master masons would hire carpenters, glaziers etc. and were highly skilled during the medieval period.
Medieval castles were very often not very comfortable, and in many cases even their owners did not want to live in them. This was not always true, however, and some lords outfitted their castles to be comfortable living quarters. In such a case, the castle could be as comfortable as any manor house. In the case of royal castles, it might be as comfortable as a palace. Perhaps the best thing about living in any castle was that it was safe from attack.
As long as there was a clear change of possession to the defense before they fumbled the ball back to the offense, then the offense would keep the ball and get a new set of downs. If the defense fumbled the ball back to the offense without ever establishing possession, then the ball would go over to the defense on downs. The only way the offense could retain possession in this case is if the ball ended up beyond the first-down marker when the offense finally recovered.
Glass production has been around for 3000 years but they were not incorporated into early castles for one obvious reason. They offer no military defense and castles were military installations. So its unlikely that windows were added till after the period that castles were strategically important. THis would have probably been during the Elizabethan/Tudor period when castles became more like stately homes than defensible miltary installations. Probably the only place you would have found glasing in a medieval Castle would have been the chapel which may have had a stained glass window in it. Of course castles could have been retrofitted with glass but few were built with it as part of the original design.
The best source of that information would come from the local tourist boards depending on what country region you are looking at. You could also browse the questions on wikianswers in the catergory "castles". As well as all that you could click on some of the related links listed below.
yes i think they could if the defense & offense have a great game... at the same game!
One word; Cannons. Castles made of stone make perfect sense and are an excellent defense against arrows or swords. But a cannonball can knock holes in your stone walls, and then knock down the walls themselves. After the development of cannons and artillery, "castles" changed shape; the new "anti-artillery castle" was the star fort, where you could position your OWN cannons to knock back the cannons that were shooting at you.