Removing the causes of mischief or controlling the effects of the mischief.
James Madison wrote about his concern regarding factions in his famous essay, "The Federalist No. 10." He believed that factions, or groups of individuals united by a common interest or opinion, were a natural and inevitable part of human nature. Madison argued that the danger of factions lied in their potential to oppress the rights of others or undermine the public good, but that a large and diverse republic with multiple factions could help control their effects through a system of checks and balances.
Federalist Paper no. 10 was written by James Madison to get the Constitution ratified. It discussed how to control factions that harbored interests that were in contrast to the rights of others. Madison argued on behalf of a strong government that could guard against factions.
"I think it was Madison who wanted as many factions as possible so that no single faction could take power." Yahoo Answers
James Madison was for Majority Rule in Federalist Number 10. He was against factions that could work against public interest.
James Madison suggested that factions could be dealt with through a system of checks and balances. In his Federalist No. 10, he argued that by expanding the number of representatives and creating a large, diverse republic, the influence of factions would be limited. He believed that a system of competing interests and the separation of powers would prevent any single faction from dominating and protect the rights of minority groups.
According to George Washington, three of the greatest threats to the nation were political divisions and the rise of political factions, foreign interference in American affairs, and economic instability. He believed that political factions would lead to a weakened and divided country, foreign interference could compromise American sovereignty, and economic instability could undermine the nation's stability and prosperity.
Factions are a group of people with interests that are a like. A lot of times in government they will use legislation to protect factions. If the factions do not represent the broad political attitude of the national as a whole and they are given too many special protections it could be an issue, but that is a matter of a opinion. An example of Government protection for factions would workers rights in a job force or farmers in the country.
James Madison's Federalist #10 was at the time arguing for the ratification of the Constitution. It proposed that factions (political parties, interest groups, etc) were both dangerous and essential to the republic: when factions go awry, a majority can make changes that are not in the interest of other citizens, and factions can also be corrupted; however, having many, and less powerful, factions can be good, for they will nullify each other and prevent one particular group/interest from overiding all of the others. Madison argued that the Constitution would basically take care of the problem of "majority" factions, and take cares of problems that arose from the Articles of Confederation at the time. In today's society, Madison would probably be pretty pleased. In the US, we have both the Democratic and the Repbulican Parties, as well as the Independent and the Tea Party and several interest groups. No faction has "too much" power, or could get away with passing certain "passions and impulses" that the others would not regulate or shut down. However, parts of Federalist #10 are flawed. Madisons idea that "The promise of a large population as a protection against individuals being elected to power would be considered a laughable proposition by the average voter" today.
By reducing the number of rights that people were used to
Idk know really but you could look for it in wickapida There you we find lots more of information about John madison
It could be written: マディソン エルラ
I could ask Dolley Madison more than one question. The main question I like to ask her it, how do you like been a president's wife?