Want this question answered?
The best way to prove that these changes occurred in the transformation lab is to compare the control to the experimental plates. Cells that were not treated with the plasmit (LB/amp (-) pGLO and LB/amp/are (-) pGLO plates) could not grow on ampicillin, wheras cells that were treated with the plasmid (LB/amp (=) pGLO and lB/amp/ara (+) pGLO plate) can grow on the LB/amp plate. Thus, the plasmid must confer resistance to ampicillin.
You can prove that isnt a chemical change because it is just a change of appearance which is considered a physical change.
Oxygen Production.
that you could get to the orient faster by sailing west than by sailing around Africa
That light was made up of the colors of the spectrum and that light could be bent.
The best way to prove that these changes occurred in the transformation lab is to compare the control to the experimental plates. Cells that were not treated with the plasmit (LB/amp (-) pGLO and LB/amp/are (-) pGLO plates) could not grow on ampicillin, wheras cells that were treated with the plasmid (LB/amp (=) pGLO and lB/amp/ara (+) pGLO plate) can grow on the LB/amp plate. Thus, the plasmid must confer resistance to ampicillin.
a significant breakthrough occurred with the establishment of the product-liability concept, whereby a plaintiff did not have to prove negligence but only had to prove that a defective product caused an injury
Pulley can prove that simple machine changes the direction of effort.
the scientific method but i dont remember the specific headings
You have to use measure and calculate things in order to prove what you believed occurred in a crime scene.
No
The prospective voter had to prove he could read and write.
If it is true - nothing. If it is untrue, and you can prove that harm to you has occurred because of it, you can sue.
In most insurance claims, the burden of proof is on the claimant - in other words, YOU have to prove the accident occurred for them to pay off the claim.
No, but it will make it much easier. The problem is without a police report it is harder to prove the accident occurred, how it occurred, who was involved, etc.
Montag could not prove that books were worth preserving and that society was better off with them.
Unless one can prove a braklight is not working, the rear car is usually at fault.